BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Probability

Expert replies
by MBA.Aspirant » Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:41 pm
Of the 700 members of an org, 120 are lawyers. Two members will be selected at random. Which of the following is closest to the probability that neither of the members selected will be a lawyer?

0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9

Now you can do it 580/700 * 579/699 = ~ 0.7

but I wanted to do it subtracted from 1. So well it be 1- [ 120/700 * 119/699]

or

1- [ (120/700 * 119/699)+ 120/700]

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:03 pm
MBA.Aspirant wrote:Of the 700 members of an org, 120 are lawyers. Two members will be selected at random. Which of the following is closest to the probability that neither of the members selected will be a lawyer?
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Now you can do it 580/700 * 579/699 = ~ 0.7

but I wanted to do it subtracted from 1. So well it be 1- [ 120/700 * 119/699]

or

1- [ (120/700 * 119/699)+ 120/700]

Thanks
Your first method is correct:
P(neither is a lawyer) = P(first is not a lawyer AND second is not a lawyer)
= P(first is not a lawyer) x P(second is not a lawyer, given that the first is not a lawyer)
= 580/700 x 579/699 ~ 0.7


Your second method doesn't use the complement correctly.
Your calculations suggest that are saying that P(neither is a lawyer) = 1 - P(both are lawyers) and this is not correct.
1 - P(both are lawyers) is the probability that both selected people are not lawyers, which is not the same as neither selected person is a lawyer.

The case were both selected people are not lawyers can include:
a) the first person is not a lawyer and the second person is a lawyer
b) the first person is a lawyer and the second person is not a lawyer
c) neither person is a lawyer.

In the question, we are concerned only with c), which means your calculation includes two extra cases.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by winniethepooh » Sun Jun 19, 2011 12:46 am
Thanks for your help, Brent. I really appreciate it. I have a couple of questions, if you can answer!
So what should the equation otherwise be? I mean to deduct the probability from 1(With numbers, if possible).

Also, as clearly visible 580 x 579/ 700 x 699 is a heavy calculation task, is there any way to make it easier(or some short calculation method)?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:55 am
Also, as clearly visible 580 x 579/ 700 x 699 is a heavy calculation task, is there any way to make it easier(or some short calculation method)
Good question.
Here's one method. First recognize that 580/700 and 579/699 are pretty much equal (close enough for this question), so let's just calculate (580/700)(580/700)

Also recognize that 580/700 = 58/70 = 29/35

Now 28/35 = 0.8, so 0.8 is a little bit bigger than 0.8, which we can write as 0.8+

So, (580/700)(580/700) = (0.8+)(0.8+) = 0.64+ (the product is greater than 0.64)

At this point, we need to use some number sense to see that the product will be closer to 0.7 than to 0.6

So what should the equation otherwise be? I mean to deduct the probability from 1(With numbers, if possible).
Here I'll use L1 to denote selecting a lawyer on the first selection and N1 to denote not selecting a lawyer on the first selection.

So, P(neither is a lawyer) = 1 - P(at least one is a lawyer)
= 1 - P(L1L2 OR L1N2 OR N1L2)
= 1 - [P(L1L2) + P(L1N2) + P(N1L2)]
= 1 - [(120/700)(119/699) + (120/700)(580/699) + (580)/700)(120/699)]
= 0.7 (approx)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion