3

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:23 am
Location: Lima
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

3

by Fab » Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:22 am
Q20:
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain. Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.
B. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
C. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.
D. The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.
E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times
Followed by:2 members

by mals24 » Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:04 am
IMO A

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.

Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries-hence this rules out the possibility of reducing the number of policies (certain strategy)

Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices-this is the alternative strategy. The argument after this sentence tells why this strategy is effective.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:53 am
Thanked: 1 times

Ans

by sheena_gmat » Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:04 am
imo D

OA ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:30 am
IMO A

I think the alternate goal is not talked about, its a single goal... so D is wrong.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 3:08 am
A is the most suitable option in this case