-
shorttheworld
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:03 pm
As I noted in another post, I had a weak (2.7 cum, 3.4 finance/econ/biz) undergraduate gpa but have repaired it by posting a 3.72 in 10 classes through NYU. My undergraduate gpa was impacted heavily due to the fact that I left home due to a very negative home situation involving alcoholism and was on my own in terms of housing, food, tuition, etc and had to work heavily during school in order to make ends meet and to survive. I've talked to a good amount of people as how to portray this and generally people have said to 'briefly mention you had issues and it impacted you negatively but have grown/learned since then'. However, I just read another admissions consultants post where the consultant mentioned to another candidate that they should mention what their situation was as to create more of the story to the candidate and shine light on their situation. What is the healthy balance of these? You obviously dont want it to be a sob story and want to show what you learned and grew from, so do you briefly detail your situation, how you rose above and how youre doing well because of x y and z noww? Thank you all again for your time.
sent you some thanks -- yes that definitely is helpful, i guess the question was more so along the lines of how much of your story/the particulars you tell? do you say youre first HS graduate and college bound person in your family (i was reading someone else's post where if youre the first college bound in your family it can be seen as a bonus and both my parents had me while in HS ) as well? i definitely dont want to leave that out if it will give my application a better picture of who i am and where i come from but also dont want to make it seem like i am making excuses as you said -- perhaps a thin line?!
