kalpan800 grammar doubts !!!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

kalpan800 grammar doubts !!!

by ronniecoleman » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:08 am
First my due apologies for not posting the entire stuff....

In commercial garment construction, one advantage of serging over single needle sewing is that the seam allowance is overcast as the seam is sewn instead of with a separate process requireing deeper seam allowance.

Kalpan says it should be rather than in


how can the construction be parallel
seam allowance is overast as x rather than in separate process



******************************************************

Each of the factory owners that felt that pollution.....

kalpan says that is only used for things...

but manhattan says that can be both used for things and people.....

???



*******************************************************

grand canyon have typically seen layers of sediment in the gaping canyon, whose different colors are amazing.


kaplan says whose can refer to both layers and canyon...

but is the rule says whose, which, who... directly refer to the immediate precedent noun..

************************************************************

alterations in mood, which xyz

now which refers to mood or alterations in mood.... ??


********************************************************


The network determined that seventeen commercials should be shown during the half hour sitcom...

now i think we have to use subjunctive mood ???

********************************************


Appreciate your help!
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: kalpan800 grammar doubts !!!

by iamcste » Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:06 am
ronniecoleman wrote:Each of the factory owners that felt that pollution.....

kalpan says that is only used for things...

but manhattan says that can be both used for things and people.....

???

MG SC 3 has rectified this issue

"That" can only refer to "things"



*******************************************************


************************************************************

alterations in mood, which xyz

now which refers to mood or alterations in mood.... ??


"mood" is something that is a human characterisitc and hence "which" points to alterations


********************************************************


The network determined that seventeen commercials should be shown during the half hour sitcom...

now i think we have to use subjunctive mood ???


No...Determined..is not "subjunctive"

********************************************


Appreciate your help!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

Re: kalpan800 grammar doubts !!!

by ronniecoleman » Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:09 am
iamcste wrote:
ronniecoleman wrote:Each of the factory owners that felt that pollution.....

kalpan says that is only used for things...

but manhattan says that can be both used for things and people.....

???

MG SC 3 has rectified this issue

"That" can only refer to "things"



*******************************************************


************************************************************

alterations in mood, which xyz

now which refers to mood or alterations in mood.... ??


"mood" is something that is a human characterisitc and hence "which" points to alterations


********************************************************


The network determined that seventeen commercials should be shown during the half hour sitcom...

now i think we have to use subjunctive mood ???


No...Determined..is not "subjunctive"

********************************************


Appreciate your help!

Thanks a lot budday!!! :D :D
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856

• Page 1 of 1