BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

reference

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 1:02 am
Location: Switzerland
Thanked: 5 times

reference

by Fractal » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:14 pm
The fight over the restriction, regarded by opponents as unjustified, continues in our legislature.

Can regarded refer to "fight" as well as to "restriction", depending on the context?

thx
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 1:02 am
Location: Switzerland
Thanked: 5 times

by Fractal » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:28 pm
Fractal wrote:The fight over the restriction, regarded by opponents as unjustified, continues in our legislature.

Can regarded refer to "fight" as well as to "restriction", depending on the context?

thx
Another example:

The fight over the speed limit, regarded by opponents as ineffective and meddlesome and by supporters as a conserver of life and energy, continues in our legislatures and on our freeways.

--> Regarded refers to fight, and not to speed limit (according to the solution I saw). So "verb-ed modifier" doesn't necessarily modify the closest noun?!

thx a lot
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:6 members

by gunjan1208 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:09 pm
Yes. You are right. Verb modifiers may or may not touch the noun depending on the context unlike noun modifiers.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 1:02 am
Location: Switzerland
Thanked: 5 times

by Fractal » Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:43 am
gunjan1208 wrote:Yes. You are right. Verb modifiers may or may not touch the noun depending on the context unlike noun modifiers.
But in this sentence...

The fight over the speed limit, regarded by opponents as ineffective and meddlesome and by supporters as a conserver of life and energy, continues in our legislatures and on our freeways.

... "regarded" modifies incorrectly "fight" instead of "speed limit". For the meaning to be correct, "regarded" must modify "speed limit". So I don't get along with the rule "depending on the context"....

So I assume that in such a structure:

noun + noun modifier, verb-ed

--> verb-ed always modifies the noun (and not the noun modifier)

Is that correct? Experts plz? :-)
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:20 am
The fight over the speed limit, regarded by opponents as ineffective and meddlesome and by supporters as a conserver of life and energy, continues in our legislatures and on our freeways.

First of all in constructions : noun1 preposition noun2, noun modifier - the noun modifier can either modify noun 1 or noun 2 depending on the context and if there is no ambiguity.

In this sentence the reference of the verb-ed noun modifier "regarded by...'is unclear. It actually is ambiguous since it makes sense with both fight and speed limit and hence this sentence is not correct.

Lets consider a variation of this sentence:
The fight over the speed limit, set at maximum 25 mph in residential areas, continues in our legislatures.
Here there is no question that "set at ..." modifies "speed limit"

Hope this helps.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1