Hi, This is an interesting one, would like to your reasoning. thanks.
OA is A
OA is A
- Attachments
-
Melbourne, Australia.
only A's language is not strong.
premise1:questions surrounding vice mayors tax return make mayor unfit for reelection
premise2:vice mayor was elected by public before mayor and the faulty tax return is accountants mistake and so it sheds no light on vice mayors performance.
B:stimulus doesnt say any thing about the ability to perform or not perform
C:"critics should not confuse"- there is no surity in the stimulus if mayor and vicemayor should be compared or not.
D. Critics have other reasons.- there are no other reasons mentioned.
E.vice-mayor is not at fault.- to strong. (we cannot conclude this.)
Thus A
