BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep Q - p&q

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by tomada » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:19 pm
For Statement 1, consider the following:

A) p=10, q=6, n=3 => p-q > n and p, q are each > n
B) p=10, q=4, n=5 => p-q > n but only p > n

Statement 1 is insufficient.

For Statement 2, "q>p" gives no information about 'n'.

Statement 2 is insufficient.


Combining statements...

Given that p and q are both positive integers, p-q < 0.
From Statement 1, p-q > n, so n < 0.
Since n < 0 and p > 0 and q > 0, we know that p and q are both greater than n.

Answer: C
I'm really old, but I'll never be too old to become more educated.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:21 pm
given: p,q (integers) > 0 Are p,q>n ?
st(1) p-q>n means that p>n+q; since q is +ve integer, p>n+ (+ve integer) means that p>n. What about q? q<p-n, we don't know exactly if q>n, it could be both cases - e.g. p=5, q=2, n=1 2<5-1 OR p=3, q=3 and n=1 in case p=q :) which is possible because we are not told that they cannot be equal 3>3-1, hence Not Sufficient;
st(2) q>p, obviously Not Sufficient
Combined st(1&2): this must be Sufficient, as the only condition when st(1) allows for answering this question is q>p and automatically q>n

answer Yes and choice C

tito1545 wrote:A step by step approach to this please ?


Are positive integers p and q both grater than n ?

1) p-q is grater than n

2)q>p
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:26 pm
tito1545 wrote:A step by step approach to this please ?


Are positive integers p and q both grater than n ?

1) p-q is grater than n

2)q>p
The key is to simplify:
(1) tells us that p - q > n i.e. p > q + n Since q > 0 , we can say that p > q + n > n
Thus we know that p > n, but we have no way of comparing q with n

NOT SUFF

(2) says nothing about n
NOT SUFF

(T) q > p from (2) and p > n from (1). Thus q > n as well

SUFF
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:30 pm
Hi Kevin, may I pay you to reply on my query in pm?
kevincanspain wrote:
tito1545 wrote:A step by step approach to this please ?


Are positive integers p and q both grater than n ?

1) p-q is grater than n

2)q>p
The key is to simplify:
(1) tells us that p - q > n i.e. p > q + n Since q > 0 , we can say that p > q + n > n
Thus we know that p > n, but we have no way of comparing q with n

NOT SUFF

(2) says nothing about n
NOT SUFF

(T) q > p from (2) and p > n from (1). Thus q > n as well

SUFF
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:33 am
Could you resend it? Thanks
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion