-
necromancer_678
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:07 pm
Although the government's expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than that spent by tobacco companies, many believe that the government should allocate no more funds to a battle they perceive as pointless.
A - expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than
B - expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically less than
C - expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically lower than
D - law suit expenditures regarding tobacco companies amount to a dramatically lower sum than
E - law suit expenditures against tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than
"sum" is an uncountable noun ...isn't it ??
A - expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than
B - expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically less than
C - expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically lower than
D - law suit expenditures regarding tobacco companies amount to a dramatically lower sum than
E - law suit expenditures against tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than
"sum" is an uncountable noun ...isn't it ??
