rommysingh wrote:On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

(1) xyz<0
(2) xy<0

Neither statement is sufficient alone, as we'll see when we combine them. Using both, we know xy < 0, and (xy)(z) < 0, so z must be positive. We also know that x is closer to z than it is to y, and that x and y have opposite signs (because xy < 0). But that still leaves us with possible number lines like this one:

-----y-----0-------z--x-------

where the answer to the question is 'yes', and this one:

-----y------0--------x---z-----

where the answer to the question is 'no', so the two statements together are not sufficient and the answer is E.

Hi rommysingh,

This question can be solved in a number of different ways. You can use a combination of TESTing VALUES and Number Properties to get to the solution:

We're told that, on a number line, the distance between X and Y is GREATER than the distance between X and Z. We're asked if Z is BETWEEN X and Y on the number line. This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: (X)(Y)(Z) < 0

This tells us that the three variables are either all negative OR 1 negative and 2 positives.

IF...
X = 1
Y = -2
Z = 2
Then the answer to the question is NO.

IF...
X = 2
Y = -2
Z = 1
Then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: (X)(Y) < 0

This tells us that one variable is positive and the other is negative. Unfortunately it tells us NOTHING about Z. As it stands though, the TESTs that I did in Fact 1 fit Fact 2 as well....

IF...
X = 1
Y = -2
Z = 2
Then the answer to the question is NO.

IF...
X = 2
Y = -2
Z = 1
Then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we already have two TESTs that fit BOTH Facts and produce different answers (a NO and a YES), so there's no more work needed.
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich