BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x^n = x^(n+2)

Expert replies
by navalpike » Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:58 pm
I’ve seen this in another link but the explanation did not help.

x^n = x^(n+2) for any integer n. Is it true that x>0?

1. x=(x^2) – 2
2. 2x < x^5

Kindly show your thought process. Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vamsikrishnach » Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:27 am
Heey..the given eqn can be simplified to x=+1 or -1.

Coming to option 1,you can simplify it to x(x-1)=2 and only -1 or 2 satisifie this eqn. So with this we can say x = -1. So question is answered that x is < 0.

Option 2 does not give integer values for x so ,IMO ans is A
Join the discussion

Re: x^n = x^(n+2)

by ssmiles08 » Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:34 pm
navalpike wrote:I’ve seen this in another link but the explanation did not help.

x^n = x^(n+2) for any integer n. Is it true that x>0?

1. x=(x^2) – 2
2. 2x < x^5

Kindly show your thought process. Thanks.
the question stem further simplified:

x^(n+2) - x^n = 0.

x^n(x^2 - 1) = 0

(x^2 - 1) = (x-1)(x+1)

so it can be written as x^n(x+1)(x-1) = 0.

1)
x^2 - x - 2 = 0

(x-2)(x+1) = 0

from here we can conclude that x = -1 given the help of the question stem. SUFF.

2) x can be various values depending on n. x = -1, 2, n can be 0, 2...so on INSUFF.

IMO A.
Join the discussion

by navalpike » Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:51 am
1)
x^2 - x - 2 = 0

(x-2)(x+1) = 0

from here we can conclude that x = -1 given the help of the question stem. SUFF.
But can we also not conlude that x = 2?
Join the discussion

by ssmiles08 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:13 pm
navalpike wrote:
But can we also not conlude that x = 2?
No because in the question stem it tells you that x must +1 or -1 or 0.

(x^2 - 1) = (x-1)(x+1)

for x^n = 0, x= 0.


when statement 1 tells us that x = 2 or x = -1, we can take out 2 b/c it tells you x can only be -1, 1 or 0.

in this case, we can confirm x = -1.
Join the discussion

by kaulnikhil » Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:03 pm
Doesnt the second ans also help us to reach the conclusion that X=-1
all other values which we get for second dont match with x=1 or x=0
which we have obtained from the question ..hence according to me second also is sufficient ..
Am i on the right track ??
Join the discussion

by hk » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:54 pm
I would go with D

the question can be simplified as X= -1 , 0, 1

And then main question is => is x>0?

1) Substitute value of x as -1, 1, 0 and you will find out that only x=-1 solves the equation. => Sufficient
2) Similarly substitute the same values of x and you will find that only x=-1 will solve the inequality!!! => Sufficient!!
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion