1000CR Question No 20 : Test 1

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:41 pm

1000CR Question No 20 : Test 1

by samyak » Mon May 03, 2010 10:22 am
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

20. The force of the evidence cited above is most seriously weakened if which of the following is true?
(A) Gerbils, small animals long native to the area, dig large burrows into which objects can fall when the burrows collapse.
(B) Pottery of types 1 and 2, found in the lower level, was used in the cities from which, according to the legend, the besieging forces came.
(C) Several pieces of stone from a lower-layer wall have been found incorporated into the remains of a building in the middle layer.
(D) Both the middle and the lower layer show evidence of large-scale destruction of habitations by fire.
(E) Bronze ax heads of a type used at the time of the siege were found in the lower level of excavation.

To me it's not clear why option A should be chosen.Please help.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:59 am
Thanked: 13 times

by iamseer » Mon May 03, 2010 10:59 am
Something (pottery of type 3) is found somewhere (bottom of middle level). If we have to weaken this evidence we have to cite alternative reasons for it being there.

A - gives an alternative reason why the pottery could be found there.

Remaining 4 options are not-related. Hence eliminated.
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"