1000 CR Q5

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 559
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:29 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members

1000 CR Q5

by Cybermusings » Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:31 am
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.
Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?
(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:29 am
Thanked: 2 times

by leo » Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:11 am
My Answer is C. What's the answer?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:29 am

by ns88 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:06 am
This question id from Test A. Q5

The answer is B.

a) “guilty of equally serious distortions”—wasn’t quantified
c) “any attempt at editing” ---too strong

d) “his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness”—too general. Too strong.

e) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson—it’s the earl editors, not all editors

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Mon Apr 18, 2016 3:45 am
B the msot suitable answer