BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

QN 74 - OG 12th ed (perfect past vs simple past)

Expert replies
by gurpreetsingh.1982 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:30 pm
Good day everyone,

In the below question (qn 74 from OG 12th ed), the answer to this question is D. the methodology used is that the agreement extends till present day, hence "are allowed" should be used instead of "had been allowed".
However, what I would like to know is 1. how this assumption (that the agreement extends till present day) is derived, and
2. why can't I use A to be my answer? "had been allowed" is in the perfect past, which contrasts with "reduced" that's in the simple past

QUOTE

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United
States reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump into the
Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that
municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities
have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for
dumping by municipalities

UNQUOTE

Thanks!
Gurpreet
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:43 pm
The agreement can only reduce the amount of phosphates being dumped going forward; it can't reduce them in the past. Thus, we can use present tense ("are allowed"), but past perfect ("had been allowed") doesn't work with the meaning of the sentence.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by scholardream » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:12 am
Hi Bill,
I am not clear with the explanation of " Thus, we can use present tense ("are allowed"), but past perfect ("had been allowed") doesn't work with the meaning of the sentence. "
I thought the action of dumping the waste into the Great Lakes happened before the agreement. So, the action was happening and stopped by the time agreement was reached. Is it right ?
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:31 am
If we think about the events on a timeline, we have:


Past-------(dumping occurs)-------1972: reduction happens---------------Present

Right away, we can get rid of C and E for using the present tense "reduces" for an event that happened in 1972. A, B, and D all used "reduced" correctly.

A and B both use past perfect (A uses "had been allowed" and B uses "had been dumping"). What happened before the reduction agreement is actually irrelevant; it has already occurred, and the agreement can't affect that. Rather, the reduction affects the amount of phosphates dumped in 1972 and beyond, so we need a tense that reflects that.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by gurpreetsingh.1982 » Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:43 pm
Hi Bill,

Fair enough. If we have to make a decision (between A,B and D) based on the assumption that the 1972 agreement would continue till today, then D would be the choice that makes logical sense here.

The perspective that I had was that this sentence was describing what happened since the past (when dumping occurred) till 1972 (when reduction happened) only. Had not taken consideration for the period of time from 1972 till present, which would have helped me answer the question correctly.

I guess it's a matter of interpreting this question. Thanks for your help, will keep a look-out when dealing with other questions like this.

Gurpreet
Join the discussion