Tough Modifier SC

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:10 pm
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

Tough Modifier SC

by satishchandra » Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:56 am
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata
and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been
a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
.
(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the
Spaniards
(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership
(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards
(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]

Can some body please explain clearly the meaning first and then POE?
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:46 am
satishchandra wrote:At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the
Spaniards
Intended meaning: Radical faction proposed a new form of land ownership; It also says before the faction proposed the new form Mexican HAD 'pre-columbian form'. See the use of past perfect HAD BEEN that shows tht pre-columbian is the earlier form the ownership.

Sentence appears grammatically correct but IMO there is some degree of ambiguity in what the 'the prep ph TO WHAT...' modifies. It could modify LAND (noun modifier) or PROPOSED (verb modifier) - this ambiguity is bcoz THIS PHRASE IS PLACED AFTER A COMMA. I will always be skeptical of prep ph strating with TO after a comma.
satishchandra wrote: (B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
Distorts the meaning - absence of HAD BEEN does not show that pre-Columbians is the earlier form of ownership
satishchandra wrote: (C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership
Distorts the meaning - absence of HAD BEEN does not show that pre-Columbians is the earlier form of ownership

satishchandra wrote: (D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards
Distorts the meaning - absence of HAD BEEN does not show that pre-Columbians is the earlier form of ownership

satishchandra wrote: (E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards


Use of HAD BEEN is correct; Removed prep ph ambiguity by avoiding comma and converting into a relative clause that clearly modifies LAND.

IMO E

I disagree with OA

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:11 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by jumsumtak » Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:27 am
@patanjali.purpose : The phrase after 'that' is not supposed to modify land but the ownership itself (it gives further information about what kind of ownership and not land). Hence use of that is incorrect.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:35 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:610

by karthikgmat » Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:21 am
it took me a long time to reach to A. Yes, jumsumtak was saying correct. 'That' in E incorrectly modifies land which was unnecessary. The sentence is talking about ownership at the time of revolution and pre columbian ownership, but not about land.

IMO A.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:41 am
satishchandra wrote:At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata
and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been
a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
.
(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the
Spaniards
(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership
(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards
(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]

Can some body please explain clearly the meaning first and then POE?
I posted an explanation here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/mexican-agra ... cityevent=

Meaning:
The faction proposed a return to...a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.

In A, what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership is in apposition to communal ownership of land.
Two nouns (or noun phrases) are in apposition when they appear side-by-side, with the second serving to explain or define the first.
Thus, the faction proposed a return TO COMMUNAL OWNERSHIP -- in other words, TO WHAT HAD BEEN a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:12 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by henryjejo » Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:53 am
Hi Mitch,

Agree that "A" is the answer out of the lot...Do we need "to" after land.

Thanks
Jerry

• Page 1 of 1