BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

I NEED HELP T.T

Expert replies
by salimgmat » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:16 pm
Although the organic farms in the agricultural community of Greendale are destined to shut down within the next decade as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods, the farmland will not go unused for long. In the decade since the opening of OmniFoods, Inc., a non-organic farm conglomerate, a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Many customers of OmniFoods, Inc. are expected to buy less nonorganic food than they did before the Full Foods farm opened in Greendale.

B. The new farms that have opened in the agricultural community of Greendale since OmniFoods, Inc. opened have been primarily organic farms.

C. The agricultural community of Greendale currently has more different farms operating within its borders than it ever has before.

D. Many farms in Greendale sell produce that is not available to buy from either OmniFoods, Inc. or from Full Foods.

E. The demand for organic food is expected to increase at a faster rate over the next decade than at any time over the past fifty years.


i could not understand this , first the author said the farms in Greendale closed becuse of mega-farm Full Foods "as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods" then he said the farms closed because of OmniFoods " a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale
that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.", so How the organic farms in Greendale closed because organic farms , then the auothor say also, they closed because a non-organic farm?

please could you explane more ??
Last edited by salimgmat on Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by chetansharma » Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:35 am
salimgmat wrote:i could not understand this , first the author said the farms closed becuse of mega-farm Full Foods "as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods" then he said the farms closed because of OmniFoods " a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale
that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.", so How the organic farms in Greendale closed because organic farms , then the auothor say also, they closed because a non-organic farm?

please could you explane more ??
Dude,

Just recheck your post. It does not make any sense (atleast to me). May be please edit your post so that other members can help you out in the question

Regards,
Chetan
If my post helped you - let me know by pushing the thanks button :wink:
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:15 am
salimgmat wrote:i could not understand this , first the author said the farms closed becuse of mega-farm Full Foods "as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods" then he said the farms closed because of OmniFoods " a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale
that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.", so How the organic farms in Greendale closed because organic farms , then the auothor say also, they closed because a non-organic farm?

please could you explane more ??
You have to copy paste the Cr exactly as you found it to have your quesries resolved on BTG
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by salimgmat » Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:19 am
Although the organic farms in the agricultural community of Greendale are destined to shut down within the next decade as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods, the farmland will not go unused for long. In the decade since the opening of OmniFoods, Inc., a non-organic farm conglomerate, a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Many customers of OmniFoods, Inc. are expected to buy less nonorganic food than they did before the Full Foods farm opened in Greendale.

B. The new farms that have opened in the agricultural community of Greendale since OmniFoods, Inc. opened have been primarily organic farms.

C. The agricultural community of Greendale currently has more different farms operating within its borders than it ever has before.

D. Many farms in Greendale sell produce that is not available to buy from either OmniFoods, Inc. or from Full Foods.

E. The demand for organic food is expected to increase at a faster rate over the next decade than at any time over the past fifty years.

My Question is ....
i could not understand this , first the author said the farms closed in Greendale becuse of mega-farm Full Foods "as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods" then he said the farms closed because of OmniFoods " a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale
that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.", so How the organic farms in Greendale closed because organic farms , then the auothor say also, they closed because a non-organic farm?

please could you explane more ??
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:45 am
salimgmat wrote:Although the organic farms in the agricultural community of Greendale are destined to shut down within the next decade as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods, the farmland will not go unused for long. In the decade since the opening of OmniFoods, Inc., a non-organic farm conglomerate, a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Many customers of OmniFoods, Inc. are expected to buy less nonorganic food than they did before the Full Foods farm opened in Greendale.

B. The new farms that have opened in the agricultural community of Greendale since OmniFoods, Inc. opened have been primarily organic farms.

C. The agricultural community of Greendale currently has more different farms operating within its borders than it ever has before.

D. Many farms in Greendale sell produce that is not available to buy from either OmniFoods, Inc. or from Full Foods.

E. The demand for organic food is expected to increase at a faster rate over the next decade than at any time over the past fifty years.

My Question is ....
i could not understand this , first the author said the farms closed in Greendale becuse of mega-farm Full Foods "as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods" then he said the farms closed because of OmniFoods " a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale
that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.", so How the organic farms in Greendale closed because organic farms , then the auothor say also, they closed because a non-organic farm?

please could you explane more ??
You are mixing up the 2 thoughts
In a Cr , premises are jumbled up and served up in no particular order.
Here in this CR , the author says that
BECAUSE
In the decade since the opening of OmniFoods, Inc., a non-organic farm conglomerate, a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.
This is a different pice of information

Its like this
Mr apollo :the organic farms in the agricultural community of Greendale are destined to shut down within the next decade as a result of competition from the organic mega-farm Full Foods,
Mr Mars:
But the farmland will not go unused for long.
Mr Apollo;How can You say that ?
Mr Mars : Because
In the decade since the opening of OmniFoods, Inc., a non-organic farm conglomerate, a new owner has bought and reopened every farm in Greendale that has shut down due to competition with OmniFoods, Inc.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:50 am
Join the discussion

by salimgmat » Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:06 pm
thanks that was helpful
Join the discussion

by theforrestgump » Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:35 pm
This is based on a timeline...what we understand from this question is that
AT PRESENT: FullFoods is competing with organic farms and causing these organic farms to close down.
IN THE PAST: OmniFoods always bought farms that closed down due to competition from OmniFoods and re-opened them.
Conclusion: These farms that have closed down will not go unused for long, since OmniFoods will buy and reopen them.

Option B
tells us that IN THE PAST when, a farm closed down and OmniFoods re-opened it, they re-opened it as organic....so IN THE PRESENT OmniFoods will not want to buy the farms that closed down due to FullFoods and re-open them as organic, as FullFoods will still create competition and force them to close down again.

Hence, it is B

Tadaa...!!!...this question is a rip-off from OG12#104.

GoodLuck
Join the discussion