BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep question

Expert replies
by jc114 » Tue May 22, 2007 1:53 pm
Numismatist: In medieval Spain, most gold coins were minted from gold mined in West Africa, in the area that is now Senegal. The gold mined in this region was the purest known. Its gold content of 92 percent allowed coins to be minted without refining the gold, and indeed coins minted from this source of gold can be recognized because they have that gold content. The mints could refine gold and produced other kinds of coins that had much purer gold content, but the Senegalese gold was never refined.
As a preliminary to negotiating prices, merchants selling goods often specified that payment should be in coins minted from Senegales gold.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain this preference?

(A) because refined gold varied considerable in purity, specifying a price as a number of regined gold coins did not fix the quantity of gold received in payment.
(B) During this period most day-to day trading was conducted using silver coins, though gold coins were used for costly transactions and lost-distance commerce.
(C) The mints were able to determine the purity, and hence, the value, of gold coins by measuring their density.
(D) Since gold coins' monetary value rested on the gold they contained, payments were frequently made using coins.
(E) Merchants obtaining gold to resell for use in jewelry could not sell the metal unless it was first refined.

Could someone explain pls?? :x
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Cybermusings » Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 am
Is the answer A?

The paragraph highlights that gold sourced from Senegal was so pure (92% gold content to be precise), that it did not have to undergo a refinement process before coins were minted from it. On the other hand gold from other sources could be used to mint coins of even higher purity, but such gold needed to undergo a refinement process first. However, traders still preferred payment in terms of coins made from Gold in Senegal

B - Out of context. We are comparing gold coins made from Senegalese gold and other gold. Hence trading in silver coins is out of context
E - This would give reason to the merchants to trade in "other gold" which had already undergone refinement instead of Senegalese gold. Hence eliminate
D - Again we are not comparing why coins from Senegalese gold was preffered over coins from "other gold". Hence irrelevant
C - Density is irrelevant to the argument
A - Clearly explains that even though "other gold" underwent purification or refinement...the process wasn't standardised and hence the merchants could not ascertain how much gold they received if they specified the payment in terms of number of gold coind

Hence A....OA please?
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Wed May 23, 2007 6:29 pm
One more for A.

B, C and D are out of scope.

E can be interpreted both "for" and "against" - inconclusive.
Join the discussion

by jc114 » Thu May 24, 2007 4:08 am
OA is A :)
Join the discussion

by john83.amar » Tue May 03, 2016 2:48 am
I totally agree with answer A.
Join the discussion