BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Video renters

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by banker1 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:05 pm
IMO: E

We want to weaken Brad's explanation.

It seems Brad assumed Videorama's sales were the only negative factor contributing to a reduction in rentals.

(A) does not weaken Brad's argument, it does not explain why rentals were still down compared to 1993

(B) same explanation as (A)

(C) irrelevant

(D) irrelevant and out of scope

(E) is the right answer, if people loan movies to one another then they do not need to rent them from stores.
Last edited by banker1 on Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

CR Videorama

by crak.gmat » Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:22 pm
Thanks Banker1, makes sense!!
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:47 am
IMO: E
E express other reason for this decline rather than Brad's explanation,
:shock:
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:12 am
I am leaning more towards E, but I'm not sure about it.
Join the discussion