BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The 25% Tax Credit

Expert replies
by quocbao » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:46 am
Spending on research and development by US businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8% over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 - when outlays for research and development increased 16.4% over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25% tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

A. Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits

B. Business spending on research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%

C. Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending have increased more than it did

D. In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was

E. Tax credits marked for specific investment are rarely effective in including businesses to make those investments

OA after few discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by S0laris » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:07 am
IMO D - bc it says that without taxes outlays might be higher, and if it's not then conclusion is flawed and gov has nothin to do with lower spendings
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

by quocbao » Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:00 am
Can you explain why E is wrong ? Is it out of scope ?
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:23 am
IMO D, I think E is out of scope, it does not say anything about research and development, could be talking about any area.
Join the discussion

by gmat620 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:19 am
D should be the answer but E is extension so D must be true for conclusion to hold.
Join the discussion

by Musicolo » Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:48 am
I am also going with D.

E is not correct since it is too general. I couldn't find any firm link between statement E and the main article. E could be referring to anything really.
D is the only that sticks with the main article and has some logical link with the main article.
Is D the OA?
Join the discussion

by quocbao » Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:05 pm
OA is D

Thanks everyone
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 2:34 am
One more for D
Join the discussion