BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAC paper based tests

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times
Followed by:1 members

by jayhawk2001 » Sat May 12, 2007 9:03 am
I'm going to choose A

If the recycled pulp in 2010 is going to be atleast equal to fresh pulp
and if the amount of fresh pulp is going to be greater than last year,
then (recycled pulp in 2010) >= (2xrecycled pulp last year)
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 6:25 am
Location: MA
Thanked: 1 times

by bww » Sun May 13, 2007 11:06 am
I agree, best should be A.

B states that by 2010 the industry will use twice as much total pulp as last year. We know that use of fresh pulp will increase, but we don't know if by at least twice as much.

C makes sense that industry will produce more paper, but no given amount is implied.

D we have no info as to what paper products consist of (or rather, what combinations, if any, of recycled and fresh pulp are used)

E similar to D. It's a feasible assumption, but too far of a reach for the ETS.

For A, we know that at the very least, recycled pulp use in 2010 will equal that of fresh pulp use last year (which was 2x recycled pulp use).
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:00 am

by graem83d » Tue May 03, 2016 3:41 am
I also will go with option A.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1