BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Scorpion bites

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
Thanked: 26 times

Scorpion bites

by chidcguy » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:54 pm
In 1984, almost 2% of humans who were admitted to the hospital ER after suffering scorpion bite in SW united states died from the attack., Ten years later, this figure had jumped to 4%. Clearly, the venom of Scorpion ha sbecome much more toxic to humans

Which of the following weakens the conclusion in the above argument?

(A) Scorpion Pop in SW united states has remained steady since 1984

(B) There have been few innovations in the treatment of Scorpion bite since 1984

(C) Most people who suffer Scorpion bite are inexperienced hikers who are unaware of the best methods to avoid coming in contact with scorpion

(D) Since 1984, people have learned that scorpion bites can be treated in the home as long as they are detected early

(E) People who survive one scorpion bite have a better than average chance of surviving a second one
Last edited by chidcguy on Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:03 pm

Re: Scorpion bites

by duke » Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:48 pm
chidcguy wrote:In 1984, almost 2% of humans who were admitted to the hospital ER after suffering scorpion bite in SW united states died from the attack., Ten years later, this figure had jumped to 4%. Clearly, the venom of Scorpion ha sbecome much more toxic to hiumans

(A) Scorpion Pop in SW united states has remained steady since 1984

(B) There have been few innovations in the treatment of Scorpion bite since 1984

(C) Most people who suffer Scorpion bite are inexperienced hikers who are unaware of the best methods to avoid coming in contact with scorpion

(D) Since 1984, people have learned that scorpion bites can be treated in the home as long as they are detected early

(E) People who survive one scorpion bite have a better than average chance of surviving a second one
This question is for what? Weaken? Strengthen? Assumption???
Assuming that it's for weakening...I pick D.
Looking for 780~
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:48 am
Thanked: 15 times

by durgesh79 » Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:32 pm
I think its D

D gives an alternate reason for the jump in % figure...

For example there were 100 bites..... and all of them reached hospital and 2 died...

Ten years later, lets say there were still 100 bites, but only 50 of them reached hospital becuase people could treat some cases in home... again 2 died, but the hospital % went yp to 4%...
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:16 pm

by agent47 » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:55 pm
Me with D too..
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: Scorpion bites

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:14 pm
chidcguy wrote:In 1984, almost 2% of humans who were admitted to the hospital ER after suffering scorpion bite in SW united states died from the attack., Ten years later, this figure had jumped to 4%. Clearly, the venom of Scorpion ha sbecome much more toxic to humans

Which of the following weakens the conclusion in the above argument?

(A) Scorpion Pop in SW united states has remained steady since 1984

(B) There have been few innovations in the treatment of Scorpion bite since 1984

(C) Most people who suffer Scorpion bite are inexperienced hikers who are unaware of the best methods to avoid coming in contact with scorpion

(D) Since 1984, people have learned that scorpion bites can be treated in the home as long as they are detected early

(E) People who survive one scorpion bite have a better than average chance of surviving a second one
A classic GMAT causation argument.

Effect: death rate from scorpion bites seen in hospitals has risen from 2% to 4%

Author's cause: scorpion venom has become more toxic.

Our prediction: look for an alternative explanation (i.e. another reason why the rate has jumped from 2% to 4%).

As others have noted, only choice (d) gives us another reason why the hospital death rate from scorpion bites has increased - if people who detect it early are treating it at home, then the bites seen in the hospital are more likely to be ones that aren't detected until later on.

The remaining choices are all irrelevant:

(a) don't care about # of scorpions, since we're talking about a death RATE.

(b) would explain why death rate would stay the same, not why it would go up.

(c) explains an increase in the number of bites, but not an increase in the death rate due to bites.

(e) we have no clue how many times people in the stats have been bitten.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Tue May 10, 2016 11:57 pm
I would go for D as well. It seems the best and safest among the rest.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1