1000 CR - Set17

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 10:58 pm

1000 CR - Set17

by RM » Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:36 pm
The cotton farms of Country Q became so productive that the market could not absorb all that they produced. Consequently, cotton prices fell. The government tried to boost cotton prices by offering farmers who took 25 percent of their cotton acreage out of production direct support payments up to a specified maximum per farm.

The government’s program, if successful, will not be a net burden on the budget. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be so?

(A) Depressed cotton prices meant operating losses for cotton farms, and the government lost revenue from taxes on farm profits.

(B) Cotton production in several counties other than Q declined slightly the year that the support-payment program went into effect in Q.

(C) The first year that the support-payment program was in effect, cotton acreage in Q was 5% below its level in the base year for the program.

(D) The specified maximum per farm meant that for very large cotton farms the support payments were less per acre for those acres that were withdrawn from production than they were for smaller farms.

(E) Farmers who wished to qualify for support payments could not use the cotton acreage that was withdrawn from production to grow any other crop.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by jrbrown2 » Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:20 am
I'm going with A

B & C don't take into account the gov't's budget or how it might affect it.
D weakens the conclusion
E (Weakens) gov't would not receive tax revenue on unused land even if another crop were grown.

Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:35 am
Please help on this one.

Looks A to me but not very convinced.

Thanks.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 11:46 am
Followed by:1 members

by cool7241744 » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:04 pm
Definitely IMO A is the right answer because it strengthen the government policy.
because
B is irrelevant
C could be the result of this program
D and E are Weakens the argument

A is showing the bad effect of the current scenario without or before implementation of the new government Program