BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

How many integers k greater than 100 and less than 1000 are there such that if the hundreds and the unit digits of k...

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorLU » Wed Feb 10, 2021 7:49 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Source: Manhattan Prep

How many integers k greater than 100 and less than 1000 are there such that if the hundreds and the unit digits of k are reversed, the resulting integer is k + 99?

A. 50
B. 60
C. 70
D. 80
E. 90

The OA is D
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

BTGmoderatorLU wrote: ↑
Wed Feb 10, 2021 7:49 am
Source: Manhattan Prep

How many integers k greater than 100 and less than 1000 are there such that if the hundreds and the unit digits of k are reversed, the resulting integer is k + 99?

A. 50
B. 60
C. 70
D. 80
E. 90

The OA is D
Solution:

Let k be abc where a, b and c represent the hundreds, tens and units digits, respectively. Then, k = 100a + 10b + c. According to the given information, cba = k + 99; thus:

cba = 100a + 10b + c + 99

100c + 10b + a = 100a + 10b + c + 99

99c - 99a = 99

c - a = 1

Notice that a cannot be 0 since a is the hundreds digit of k. Notice also that a cannot be 9 because that would mean c = 10, which is impossible since c is a digit. Therefore, the possible values of a are 1, 2, … , 8 and the corresponding values of c are 2, 3, … , 9. Thus, there are 8 possible choices for a and c.

There are no restrictions over b, thus for any a, c pair, there are 10 possible values of b. Since there are 8 possible a, c pairs and since there are 10 possible values of b for each pair, there are 8 x 10 = 80 such integers k.

Let’s pick one of the possible values of a, b and c and verify that it satisfies the conditions of the question. Let a = 3 and b = 5. Since c - a = 1, it follows that c = 4; thus k = 354. If we reverse the hundreds and the units digit of 354, we obtain 453 and the difference is indeed 453 - 354 = 99.

Answer: D

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion