explain

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:45 am
You're right that neither statement (1) nor (2) are sufficient, so I'll jump to what happens when we combine both pieces of information.

From (1) we can conclude that angleRQS = angleRSQ
From (2) we can conclude that angleTUS = angleTSU

We also know that:
(angleRQS + angleRSQ + angleR) + (angleTUS + angleTSU + angleT) = 360

Here's the big part: angleR + angleT = 90 (since they must add to angleP to get 180 degrees)

So, we can conclude that (angleRQS + angleRSQ) + (angleTUS + angleTSU) = 270

Since angleRQS = angleRSQ and angleTUS = angleTSU, we can say that: angleRSQ + angleTSU = 135

Finally, since angleRSQ + angleTSU + angle X must add to be 180, we can conclude that angle x is 45

So the answer is E

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:55 am
angle rqs = angle rsq = y

2y = 180 - angle prt

y = 90 - angle prt /2

Similarly

angle sut = angle ust = z

z= 90 - angle stu

y + z = 180- x

90 + 90 - ( prt + stu )

180- 90 = 90
x = 90

Hence both are together sufficient
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856