Search found 57 matches
(x-1)(y-1) = 1?
Statement 2 says x=y. However, x and y could be any number (3,20,-1/2), so we're not sure if it's 1.
- by djiddish98
Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:05 am- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: OG 2nd ed # 83
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1501
Is there an easy way to do the calculation of 1.44/1.21? I'm not seeing any help by prime factorization.
- by djiddish98
Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:39 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: grockit pS
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1625
A) 16^4 B) (4!)^4 C) 16!/[(4!)^4] D) 16!/4! E) 4^16 I might find it helpful if I work in reverse on some of these more difficult combination problems. So I'm going to try and figure out the description for each answer and see if something matches up to the question at hand. A) 16^4 would apply if w...
- by djiddish98
Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:21 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: BTG practice questions
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10362
Anurag, Would you mind explaining a bit more how you get from = [16!/(12!*4!)]*[12!/(8!*4!)]*[8!/(4!*4!)]*1 = 16!/(4!*4!*4!*4!) ?? I'm a bit of a rookie at this combinatorics questions, so would really appreciate a more detailed explanation. Thanks Notice that we have 12! and 8! in the numerator an...
- by djiddish98
Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:03 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: BTG practice questions
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10362
It's basically the same thing since there aren't any prime factors between 47 and 50. mapsingh did a nice job of explaining it. One way to look at it is through the divisibility rules. If X is divisible by Y and and Z is NOT divisible by Y, then X+Z will NOT be divisible by Y. Based on mapsingh's an...
- by djiddish98
Fri May 27, 2011 4:33 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Functions
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2245
This is the figure I was thinking of that would give E (pretend that B,C and D all scale in accordance with Statement 1). http://s3.postimage.org/31tc8ew5g/area.jpg We only have the relationship between B,C and D. There's nothing in either statement that ties them to an actual area and/or the figure...
- by djiddish98
Thu May 26, 2011 4:05 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Area
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1304
I would ignore the diagram. We know that statement 1 doesn't work, because we just have ratios for 3 of the 5 potential areas, but not an actual area measurement for any of the 3 areas. Statement 2 doesn't work, since we're just given the area of A with no relation to D. If we combined them, we know...
- by djiddish98
Wed May 25, 2011 8:00 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Area
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1304
If a 5 digit number began with 0, it would technically be a 4 digit number, and out of the realm of possible numbers combinations that the question is asking for.mmenifi wrote:Hi all,
I am just wondering why zero is not considered. Isn't zero an even number?
05,328 is really 5,328.
- by djiddish98
Wed May 25, 2011 7:34 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: if the following terms apply
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3245
The first digit has 4 options (2,4,6,8 and not 0), the second has 5 options (1,3,5,7,9) the third has 3 options (3,5,7 and not 2), the fourth has 7 options (10-3 used before) and the fifth has 6 options (10-4 used before) . The total is 4*5*3*7*6 = [spoiler] 2520 [/spoiler]. As Anurag pointed out, ...
- by djiddish98
Wed May 25, 2011 4:21 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: if the following terms apply
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3245
1/F = 1/3 - 1/x = (x - 3)/3x Dumb question - How did you get from 1/3 - 1/x to (x-3)/3x? I can see that the results are equal (x/3x = 1/3 and 3/3x = 1/x), but I can't arithmetically get there. Edit: Nevermind I got it. 1/F = 1/3 - 1/x -> x/f = x/3-1 -> 3x/f = x-3 -> 1/f = (x-3)/3x. The tricky part ...
- by djiddish98
Tue May 24, 2011 1:38 pm- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Work Rate Question
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2087
- by djiddish98
Tue May 24, 2011 1:10 pm- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: A certain company assigns employees to offices in such a way
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10268
Statement 1 says that Z is closer to 10 than x. In your example however, Z is as close to X as it is to 10. Hence, you can't use your example, since it doesn't comply with the statement.mmenifi wrote:What if x=8 and Z=9, in this case 9 is not > (8+10)/2.
- by djiddish98
Tue May 24, 2011 10:13 am- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: Average
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1272
We'll want to setup an equation where x + xC2 > 12 We can easily eliminate 24 and 12, since we don't need an individual color for each client if we can make pairs. Start with the lowest amount 5 + 5C2 = 5 + 5!/(3!*2!) -> 5 + 5*4/2 -> 5 + 5*2 = 15. Since 15 > 12, we have enough colors with 5 colors t...
- by djiddish98
Tue May 24, 2011 10:11 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Gmat club PS.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1198
- by djiddish98
Tue May 24, 2011 8:31 am- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: Average
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1272
We don't know that x = y - z. Statement 1 tells us that x = z - y, once we isolate X. If we multiply all sides by negative 1, we get -x = y - z. So |x| will equal y-z only when x is a negative number, since |x| has to be positive. It's a bit confusing because when we say -x, we're saying that x is a...
- by djiddish98
Tue May 24, 2011 4:44 am- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: Is |x| = y - z ?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 22185