grockit pS

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

grockit pS

by bblast » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:17 am
An investment with the Brown company yields 10% compounded annually over 2 years, while an investment with Green Corp. yields 20% annually over the same period. If Fernando invests a given amount in Green Corp, by what percent should Rita's initial investment exceed Fernando's, if she wants to invest in Brown but match the final value of his investment?

17
18
19
20
21

C
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:29 am
Hi,
Assuming that the investment with Green Corp. to be compound interest as well.
Let their investment be x and y.
After 2 years there values will be x(1.1)^2 and y.(1.2)^2. They are equal
So, 1.21x=1.44y => x= 1.19y
So, Rita's initial investment should exceed Fernando's by 19%

Hence, C
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:1 members

by SoCan » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:36 am
I want to point out that the wording of the question isn't very clear. It specifies that the Brown investment compounds annually, but doesn't specify that the Green investment does. I solved it both ways, and the answer I get when I used simple compounding for Green didn't show up as a choice, so they meant annual compounding for both.

Final value of Brown = b*1.1^2, where b is initial investment
Final value of Green = g*1.2^2, where g is initial investment

We want the final investment value to be the same so set the equations equal to each other
b*1.21 = g*1.44
b/g = 1.44/1.21
b/g ~ 1.19 (I say approximate because 1.44/1.21 isn't a terminating decimal)

So b must exceed g by about 19%.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:01 am
Thanked: 10 times

by djiddish98 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:39 am
Is there an easy way to do the calculation of 1.44/1.21? I'm not seeing any help by prime factorization.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:1 members

by SoCan » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:54 am
djiddish98 wrote:Is there an easy way to do the calculation of 1.44/1.21? I'm not seeing any help by prime factorization.
Not that I know of... if anyone has one I'd love to hear it

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:54 am
djiddish98 wrote:Is there an easy way to do the calculation of 1.44/1.21? I'm not seeing any help by prime factorization.
Hi,
You can probably write (1.2)^2-(0.01)^2 = (1.21)(1.19) because the denominator is 1.21
So, (1.44-0.0001)/1.21 = 1.19 as we can neglect 0.0001 compared with 1.44.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:44 am
frank- how did u interpret the statement "by what percent should Rita's initial investment exceed Fernando's,"?


i got 2 numbers 1.21 and 1.44 but did not know what to do with it.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:45 am
bblast wrote:An investment with the Brown company yields 10% compounded annually over 2 years, while an investment with Green Corp. yields 20% annually over the same period. If Fernando invests a given amount in Green Corp, by what percent should Rita's initial investment exceed Fernando's, if she wants to invest in Brown but match the final value of his investment?

17
18
19
20
21

C
Assuming that each investment is compounding annually and that the question is asking by approximately what percent R's investment should exceed F's:

Let F = 100.
After 1 year, F = 100 + .2*100 = 100 + 20 = 120.
After 2 years, F = 120 + .2*120 = 120 + 24 = 144.

Now we can plug in the answers, which represent by approximately what percent R's investment should exceed F's:

Answer choice C: 19%
R = 100 + .19*100 = 119.
After 1 year, R = 119 + .1*119 = 119 + 11.9 = 130.09 ≈ 131.
After 2 years, R = 131 + .1*131 = 131 + 13.1 = 144.1 ≈ 144.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 01, 2011 10:24 am
bblast wrote:frank- how did u interpret the statement "by what percent should Rita's initial investment exceed Fernando's,"?


i got 2 numbers 1.21 and 1.44 but did not know what to do with it.
Hi,
It is analogous to "by what percent does 150 exceed 100". We simply say 50%. After first reading, you might have been confused. But, try to think again on these lines, you might get the logic.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise