• EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep

Is |x| = y - z ?

This topic has 4 expert replies and 31 member replies
Goto page Next
jsl Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
04 Jun 2008
Posted:
203 messages
Upvotes:
5
GMAT Score:
650

Is |x| = y - z ?

Post Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:56 pm
Is |x| = y - z ?

1) x + y = z
2) x < 0

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Thanked by: S.M
Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower GMAT Instructor
Joined
03 Mar 2008
Posted:
3380 messages
Followed by:
1475 members
Upvotes:
2256
GMAT Score:
800
Post Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:52 am
finally --
if anyone still has doubts about the insufficiency of statement #1, just plug in numbers to test it:
if x = 1, y = 2, z = 3, then these values satisfy statement #1, and the answer to the question is NO (since, no, |1| is not equal to 2 - 3).
if x = -1, y = -2, z = -3, then these values also satisfy statement #1, but the answer to the question is YES this time (since |-1| does, in fact, equal -2 - (-3)).

that's one "yes" and one "no", which together make an ironclad "insufficient".

_________________
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower GMAT Instructor
Joined
03 Mar 2008
Posted:
3380 messages
Followed by:
1475 members
Upvotes:
2256
GMAT Score:
800
Post Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:52 am
trzask.m wrote:
I have the same question as the above two posters and that is how I arrived at A for my answer. I wrote out the three cases for the stem, X=Y-Z, X=-y+Z, and 0=Y-Z=-y+Z.

If statement one states that X+Y=Z we can rephrase as X=-y+z, I assumed that this staement meant X was positive and therefore equal to Y-Z. I know that the OA is correct and I'm not arguing with the "bible", I just want to know the flaw in my thinking. Did I use cirular reasoning to deduce my answer?
i kindly indicated the flaw in your thinking, in bright red. (:

basically -- at risk of giving advice that is essentially tautological -- you can't assume things that, well, you can't assume.
in this case,
* statement 1 just says "x + y = z"
* you assumed "x + y = z AND x is positive"
when this is spelled out explicitly, i think it should be pretty easy for you to see the problem -- there is no reason to assume that x is positive when you look at the statement.

also, i'm not sure if you're aware of this, but data sufficiency questions are NEVER written in such a way that the two statements contradict each other. therefore, if you think that statement #1 implies that x is positive, then, well, you're wrong ... because statement #2 says that x is negative.

--

_________________
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
emalby Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
08 Feb 2011
Posted:
12 messages
Upvotes:
2
Post Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:33 am
Is |x| = y - z ?

1) x + y = z
2) x < 0

I think this method can help:

1) x = z - y => - x = y - z => |x| = - x

therefore if x = 0 then equation |x| = y - z is TRUE, if x is any other number is FALSE since no absolute value of a number x can equal a negative number - x. So 1) is not sufficient because we can have two different cases.

2) is not sufficient alone since we don't have any information on y and z. They can be whatever number, so no way to tell whether they equal x.

1 & 2) is sufficient. 2) tells us that x is lower than 0, so we go in case 1) and se that x=0, which was the only case where equation was valid (TRUE), is excluded since x is lower than 0 based 2). So we have our answer that equation |x| = y - z is FALSE!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
thebigkats Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
13 Sep 2010
Posted:
86 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
29
Test Date:
04/23/2011
Target GMAT Score:
740
GMAT Score:
710
Post Tue Dec 21, 2010 4:07 pm
Somehow I got this practice Q today only and I can see that the thread is rather old. In any case, this is how I solved it:

1. x=z-y ==> x=+ve or x=-ve or X=0

If x=+ve ==> z>y ==> y-z <0 ==> |x| <0 which is not possible
if x=-ve ==> y>z ==> y-z > 0 ==> |x| = y-z
if x=0 ==> z=y ==> |x| = 0

Given that condition #1 fails - So INSUFFICIENT

2. x<0
doesn't tell us anything about y or z

2. both #1 and #2
x is fore sure negative from #2 ==> y >z (from #1) => y-z > 0 ==> |x| = y-z

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower GMAT Instructor
Joined
03 Mar 2008
Posted:
3380 messages
Followed by:
1475 members
Upvotes:
2256
GMAT Score:
800
Post Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:15 am
gmatusa2010 wrote:
Ron,

Can you discuss this a little further. I'm still confused about what this statement means "Is |X|=y-z?" because if we are given the expression |X|=y-z then I automatically think X=y-z or X=z-y THUS the question becomes "Is X=y-z or X= z-y"? It's obviously the wrong, but can you point out the logic error here?

Ex: Is |X|>1? means X>1 or X<-1? if we can prove one or the other statement then it is sufficient.
well ... the only reason that works is because you know that the number 1 is positive in the first place, so you don't have to think about the issue that is causing the complications in this thread.
for instance, if you just go around blindly applying these rules to other cases, you'll get in trouble:
* if you turn "|x| = 1" into "x = 1 or x = -1", then of course this is ok.
* on the other hand, if you try to use the same rule to turn "|x| = -2" into "x = -2 or x = 2", then that won't work.

taking the above examples, note how they would apply to the case of an even simpler equation, such as |x| = Q.
if the number Q happens to the positive (as in the case of 1 above), then you can simply split this into x = Q or x = -Q. on the other hand, if the number Q happens to be negative (as in the case of -2 above), then there are no solutions to this equation at all.
so, if you're given the equation |x| = Q, you can't write a general solution in one piece -- you have to split it up into two cases:
either
(1) Q is positive (or 0), and then x = Q or x = -Q,
or
(2) Q is negative, and there's no solution.

what's going on in the problem above is basically the same thing. just as you can't tell whether Q it is positive or negative in my example, you can't tell which of (y - z) and (z - y) is positive in the example here, and you must know which is which in order to translate the equation away from absolute value. since you don't know which is which at the outset of the problem, your only option is to split it into two cases, just as in the case of "Q" above.

_________________
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Thanked by: tomada, Tarun Khanna
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
gmatusa2010 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
25 Jul 2010
Posted:
134 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
1
Post Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:57 am
Ron,

Can you discuss this a little further. I'm still confused about what this statement means "Is |X|=y-z?" because if we are given the expression |X|=y-z then I automatically think X=y-z or X=z-y THUS the question becomes "Is X=y-z or X= z-y"? It's obviously the wrong, but can you point out the logic error here?

Ex: Is |X|>1? means X>1 or X<-1? if we can prove one or the other statement then it is sufficient.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
pops Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
09 Jun 2009
Posted:
148 messages
Upvotes:
7
Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:31 pm
trzask.m wrote:
I have the same question as the above two posters and that is how I arrived at A for my answer. I wrote out the three cases for the stem, X=Y-Z, X=-y+Z, and 0=Y-Z=-y+Z.

If statement one states that X+Y=Z we can rephrase as X=-y+z, I assumed that this staement meant X was positive and therefore equal to Y-Z. I know that the OA is correct and I'm not arguing with the "bible", I just want to know the flaw in my thinking. Did I use cirular reasoning to deduce my answer?
Is |x| = y - z ?

1) x + y = z
2) x < 0

Hey, how can you assume that X=-y+z means x was positive ?
here, if x is positive then |x|=z-y so |x|=y-z is false
but, if x is negative then |x|=y-z so |x|=y-z is true
i.e. it all depends on sign of x
hence, combining 2. will give a definite answer Smile

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
trzask.m Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
02 Sep 2009
Posted:
5 messages
Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:56 pm
I have the same question as the above two posters and that is how I arrived at A for my answer. I wrote out the three cases for the stem, X=Y-Z, X=-y+Z, and 0=Y-Z=-y+Z.

If statement one states that X+Y=Z we can rephrase as X=-y+z, I assumed that this staement meant X was positive and therefore equal to Y-Z. I know that the OA is correct and I'm not arguing with the "bible", I just want to know the flaw in my thinking. Did I use cirular reasoning to deduce my answer?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
bigmonkey31 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
02 Jan 2010
Posted:
62 messages
Upvotes:
3
Test Date:
March 16, 2010
GMAT Score:
730
Post Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:51 am
Yeah, I have the same question as the above poster. Don't both of these equations point the the negative solution for 'X'???

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
mehravikas Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
12 May 2008
Posted:
1161 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
23
Test Date:
********
Target GMAT Score:
740
Post Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:24 pm
Sorry for bumping into an old thread. I have a doubt...lets make the question simpler

Is |x| = 3?

1. x = -3
2. x < 0

from the question we get if x > 0 then x = 3 or if x < 0 then x = -3

Statement 1 - tells us that x = -3, why do we have to consider different values of x i.e. +ve or -ve. Isnt this statement sufficient to answer that x would be equal to -3 when x < 0
Statement 2 - if x < 0, then x will be equal to -3

Am I missing something, please explain.


maihuna wrote:
I have a simple logic it seems:

Given : |X| = y-z

if x<0, -x = y-z
if x>0 x = y-z

From 1: -x = y-z we dont know abt sign of x
From 2: We know x<0 so combine will give me Yes

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
maihuna Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
28 Dec 2008
Posted:
1578 messages
Followed by:
9 members
Upvotes:
82
GMAT Score:
720
Post Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:24 am
I have a simple logic it seems:

Given : |X| = y-z

if x<0, -x = y-z
if x>0 x = y-z

From 1: -x = y-z we dont know abt sign of x
From 2: We know x<0 so combine will give me Yes

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
stop@800 Legendary Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Posted:
871 messages
Upvotes:
48
Post Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:03 am
Thanks ron.

I did the most common mistake.
while solving for B, I kept A also in mind Sad

and yes the last case u mentioned (the evil one) is wonderful Smile

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower GMAT Instructor
Joined
03 Mar 2008
Posted:
3380 messages
Followed by:
1475 members
Upvotes:
2256
GMAT Score:
800
Post Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:52 am
statement 1:
we can rephrase this to x = z - y.
there are thus 3 possibilities for the absolute value |x| :
(a) if z - y is positive, then |x| = z - y, and will NOT equal y - z (which is a negative quantity).
(b) if z - y is negative, then |x| = y - z (the opposite of z - y).
(c) if z - y = 0, then |x| equals both y - z and z - y, since each is equal to 0.
TAKEAWAY: when you consider absolute value equations, you'll often do well by considering the different CASES that result from different combinations of signs.
notice that (a) and (b), or (a) and (c), taken together prove that statement 1 is insufficient.

--

statement 2:
we don't know anything about y or z, so this statement is insufficient.**
if you must, find cases: say y = 2 and z = 1. if x = -1, then the answer is YES; if x is any negative number other than -1, then the answer is NO.

--

together:
if x < 0, then this is case (b) listed above under statement 1.
therefore, the answer to the prompt question is YES.
sufficient.

--

**note that, if i were particularly evil, i could craft a statement that doesn't mention all three of x, y, z and yet IS STILL SUFFICIENT.
here's one way i could do that:
(2) y < z
in this case, y - z is negative and therefore CAN'T equal |x| -- no matter what x is -- since |x| must be nonnegative.
so, this statement is a definitive NO, and is thus sufficient even though it doesn't mention x at all.
this is evil, but i see no reason why it wouldn't be on the test.

_________________
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
stop@800 Legendary Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Posted:
871 messages
Upvotes:
48
Post Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:04 am
IMO B

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 Roland2rule 174 topics
2 lheiannie07 110 topics
3 ardz24 64 topics
4 LUANDATO 56 topics
5 swerve 46 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

150 posts
2 image description Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

145 posts
3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

116 posts
4 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

103 posts
5 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

98 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts