if xy=1, what is the value of [2(x+y)^2]/[2(x-y)^2]?
2
4
8
16
32
OA is 16
I tried to plug in numbers but that doesn't work
xy=1
This topic has expert replies
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
so plugging numbers are useful in these question types in which you have no limitations for your X and Y
XY=1 means : X=1 and Y=1
So , the question turns into 2^4/1 = 16
That's it!
XY=1 means : X=1 and Y=1
So , the question turns into 2^4/1 = 16
That's it!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hmm, the question as it stands couldn't be a GMAT question.
To begin, there would have been a proviso that rules out the possibility of the denominator = 0 (e.g., x cannot equal y)
Also, the value of this rational expression varies as we plug in different values for x and y such that xy=1.
Where did you find this question?
To begin, there would have been a proviso that rules out the possibility of the denominator = 0 (e.g., x cannot equal y)
Also, the value of this rational expression varies as we plug in different values for x and y such that xy=1.
Where did you find this question?
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
X can be equal to Y and this gives us 2^0=1Brent Hanneson wrote:Hmm, the question as it stands couldn't be a GMAT question.
To begin, there would have been a proviso that rules out the possibility of the denominator = 0 (e.g., x cannot equal y)
Also, the value of this rational expression varies as we plug in different values for x and y such that xy=1.
Where did you find this question?
Cramya,
How about 4 x 1/4
X=Y=1 is an example that requires the less work.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
I found this on the OG prep software, its in CAT 1. This is prob not the latest version because I am using my old computer and I installed the gmat prep on this computer quite a while ago.Brent Hanneson wrote:Hmm, the question as it stands couldn't be a GMAT question.
To begin, there would have been a proviso that rules out the possibility of the denominator = 0 (e.g., x cannot equal y)
Also, the value of this rational expression varies as we plug in different values for x and y such that xy=1.
Where did you find this question?
logitech wrote:X can be equal to Y and this gives us 2^0=1Brent Hanneson wrote:Hmm, the question as it stands couldn't be a GMAT question.
To begin, there would have been a proviso that rules out the possibility of the denominator = 0 (e.g., x cannot equal y)
Also, the value of this rational expression varies as we plug in different values for x and y such that xy=1.
Where did you find this question?
Cramya,
How about 4 x 1/4
X=Y=1 is an example that requires the less work.
The denominator would be 0 if the X and Y are equal, since it's not 2^0, but 2 X 0....
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
My poor old eyes Thanks!rajataga wrote:
The denominator would be 0 if the X and Y are equal, since it's not 2^0, but 2 X 0....
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"