BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x-3

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by capnx » Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:15 pm
simplify the expression and you'll find X can take on 3 values: -3, 0, and 3

(x-3)^2 = (3-x)^2
so: x-3 = +/- (3-x) and +/-(x-3) = 3-x
either way plugging in +/-3 and 0 is easiest way lol

I is not enough, can be -3 or 0
II: -x|x| > 0 --> x|x| < 0 , so x has to be negative

B
Join the discussion

Re: x-3

by chetanojha » Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:21 pm
pathaniaus wrote:sqrt((x-3)^2) = 3 - x

1) x NOT EQUAL TO 3

2) -x|x| > 0


Please explain. I've gotten a headache just trying to figure this thing out.
Can you please post the complete question clearly?
Join the discussion

Re: x-3

by tohellandback » Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:57 pm
pathaniaus wrote:sqrt((x-3)^2) = 3 - x

1) x NOT EQUAL TO 3

2) -x|x| > 0


Please explain. I've gotten a headache just trying to figure this thing out.
sqrt(x^2)=|x|
sqrt((x-3)^2)=|x-3|
we are asked whether x-3<0 or x<3
1) NOT SUFF
2)-x|x| > 0 means x is negative
so of course x<3
SUFFICIENT
answer B
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

Re: x-3

by adilka » Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:39 am
tohellandback wrote:sqrt(x^2)=|x|
is that so... I thought that only when X^2=Y, then x=|sqrt(Y)|
But whenever you're taking a square root of a number it can only be positive, i.e. SQRT(X) can only be a positive number.
What's GMAT's stance?
Join the discussion

Re: x-3

by tohellandback » Wed Aug 19, 2009 8:03 am
adilka wrote:
tohellandback wrote:sqrt(x^2)=|x|
is that so... I thought that only when X^2=Y, then x=|sqrt(Y)|
But whenever you're taking a square root of a number it can only be positive, i.e. SQRT(X) can only be a positive number.
What's GMAT's stance?
if you say x^2=y, then x can be +sqrt(y) or -sqrt(y).
but if it is said that sqrt(x^2), then it is given as |x|.
it's just a rule or convention. whatever you say. I am yet to see a "proof" for it. I have seen Ian post the same thing. If you do a little search, you will find it.
But it is a rule and just remember it.

not a very reliable source, but still:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion