BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

working with fractions

Expert replies
by starz982 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:38 pm
Carol spends 1/4 of her savings on a stereo and 1/3 less than she spent on the stere for a television. What fraction of her savings did she spend on the stereo and television?

a)1/4
b)2/7
c)5/12
d)1/2
e)7/12

please can anyone help me understand how to break down the process to obtain the answer
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by palvarez » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:54 pm
Many ways. Pick a smart number.

In this case, pick 12, since lcm of 4 and 3 = 12. You can pick 24, 36, etc. it doesnt matter.

let 12 be savings.

spent 3 on a stereo.
2/3 of stereo = 2 on tv.

stereo + tv = 5

5/total = 5/12.
Join the discussion

by life is a test » Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:16 am
algebraically you can solve as follows:
x= amount spent.

on stereo = x/4
on tv = (x/4)*(2/3) = 2x/12 = x/6 (note: 1- 1/3 = 2/3)
total spent = x/4 + x/6 = 3x/12 + 2x/12 = 5x/12 = 5/12 *x.

hope that helps.
Join the discussion

by starz982 » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:48 am
palvarez wrote:Many ways. Pick a smart number.

In this case, pick 12, since lcm of 4 and 3 = 12. You can pick 24, 36, etc. it doesnt matter.

let 12 be savings.

spent 3 on a stereo.
2/3 of stereo = 2 on tv.

stereo + tv = 5

5/total = 5/12.
Thanks for this. Im still having a bit of difficulty with understanding how you obtain the fraction spent 2/3 of stereo on tv. when the qustion says a 1/3 less?
Join the discussion

by palvarez » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:04 am
starz982 wrote:
palvarez wrote:Many ways. Pick a smart number.

In this case, pick 12, since lcm of 4 and 3 = 12. You can pick 24, 36, etc. it doesnt matter.

let 12 be savings.

spent 3 on a stereo.
2/3 of stereo = 2 on tv.

stereo + tv = 5

5/total = 5/12.
Thanks for this. Im still having a bit of difficulty with understanding how you obtain the fraction spent 2/3 of stereo on tv. when the qustion says a 1/3 less?

x is 1/3 less of y ---> x = (1-1/3)y or 2y/3
Join the discussion

Re: working with fractions

by Testluv » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:30 pm
starz982 wrote:Carol spends 1/4 of her savings on a stereo and 1/3 less than she spent on the stere for a television. What fraction of her savings did she spend on the stereo and television?

a)1/4
b)2/7
c)5/12
d)1/2
e)7/12

please can anyone help me understand how to break down the process to obtain the answer
Hi starz982,

Picking numbers to make the problem less fuzzy is a great approach in word problems. And, if you get good at it, you will also understand the algebra much better.

In word problems involving fractions, picking the lowest common denominator is a great way to go. We see that the two denominators are 3 and 4. The lowest common denominator is 3*4 = 12.

Let her savings be 12.

She spent 1/4 of this on a stereo. What's 1/4 of 12? ...3, of cousre. So she spent 3 bucks on the stereo (what is this, the 70s?). And she spent on the television one-third less than what she spent on the stereo. Well, she spent 3 bucks on the stereo.

What number is 1/3 less than 3?
This can be read as "what number is 3 minus one-third of 3?"
A third of 3 is: 1/3*3 = 1. So, the number that is 1/3 less than 3 is: 3-1 = 2. So she spent 2 bucks on the TV.

She spent 3 + 2 bucks on the stereo and TV, for a total of 5. She started with 12. So the fraction of her savings spent on the TV and stereo is: 5/12, and choose Choice C.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by life is a test » Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:21 pm
I thought I would paste the IM conversation for others to learn from the questions.
starz982] Thanks for this. Im still having a bit of difficulty with understanding how you obtain the fraction spent 2/3 of stereo on tv. when the qustion says a 1/3 less?[/quote] the information given said that tv was 1/3 less than stereo which is the same thing as saying tv is 2/3 of stereo. try it out with made up numbers - if stereo costs 60 and tv is 1/3 less, this means tv = 60 - (1/3*60) = 40. 40/60 = 2/3 hence tv costs 2/3 of stereo. [quote= wrote: This is how I see it. 1/3 less spent on tv would mean 1/3*60 = 20
yes a '1/3' of 60 = 20 but 'a 1/3 less' than 60 = 40. this is because a 1/3 = 20, total = 60 and so '1/3 less' than 60 = 60-20 = 40

Hope that helps.
Join the discussion

by starz982 » Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:51 pm
Thak you all for your help!!

It makes sense to me now.
Join the discussion