Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Word Problem

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies
by RSK » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:59 pm
Hi guys,

I need help with this question:

If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?

1) Last week Bob was paid a total of @480 for the items that he produced that week.

2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of 510 for the items that he produced this week.
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by MBACenter » Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:59 am
RSK wrote:Hi guys,

I need help with this question:

If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?

1) Last week Bob was paid a total of @480 for the items that he produced that week.

2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of 510 for the items that he produced this week.
The stimulus tells us that as a function of the number u of units produced, the total amount Bob is compensated, T, is going to be:

T = ux when u =< 36
T = 36x + 1.5(u - 36)x when u > 36

Statement 1 is not sufficient, because not only can we not figure out which equation to use, but also we would still have u and x as unknowns with only one equation.

Statement 2 is not sufficient, for the same reason. Statement 2 would also put a second equation into the picture AND an extra T1 unknowns. We'd have too many unknowns and not enough equations.

But with statements 1 and 2 together, then we have two possible systems of equations, each with two unknowns:

480 = ux when u =< 36
510 = (u + 2)x

OR

480 = 36x + 1.5(u - 36)x when u > 36
510 = 36x + 1.5(u - 34)x

Let's solve the first pair. We get that x = 480/u and x = 510/(u + 2). So:

480/u = 510/(u + 2)
480(u[/i] + 2) = 510u
480u + 960 = 510u
960 = 30u
96 = 3u
32 = u

Okay. Let's see whether the second pair gives us anything different. Transforming our two equations, we'd get:

480 = x(36 + 1.5(u - 36))
510 = x(36 + 1.5(u - 34))

and then:

480 = x(1.5u - 18)
510 = x(1.5u - 15)

So we can transform these into x = 480/(1.5u - 18) and x = 510/(1.5u - 15). Then:

480/(1.5u - 18) = 510/(1.5u - 15)
480(1.5u - 15) = 510(1.5u - 18)
720u - 7200 = 765u - 7650
450 = 45u
10 = u

Logically this makes no sense, since this formula only applies to a situation in which u would be GREATER than 36. Thus it is irrelevant and impossible.

The answer is 32, so both statements together are sufficient.
Academic Coordinator
MBA Center Paris
Join the discussion