While depressed property values...

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:23 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

While depressed property values...

by Magellan » Fri May 09, 2008 4:18 am
While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose equity - in many cases representing a life's savings - can plunge or even disappear.

(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their
(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose

OA is A

It seems to me that the pronoun 'they' has no clear antecedent. It can be either 'property values' or 'large investors' --> why isn't it a problem?

Source: OG10 (question 159)
Last edited by Magellan on Fri May 09, 2008 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:49 am

by barron » Fri May 09, 2008 4:29 am
My answer is E

is this correct?

all others are elimnated because they and their doesn't have any clear antecedant

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:38 am
Thanked: 1 times

by tar.goyal » Mon May 12, 2008 12:11 am
E is incorrect because it uses it(singular) to refer to depressed property values(plural).

if I go on eliminating the incorrect answers, I will mark all of them out.

Please suggest!
I have started to realize that I am the one!!!

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:38 am
Thanked: 1 times

by tar.goyal » Mon May 12, 2008 12:11 am
E is incorrect because it uses it(singular) to refer to depressed property values(plural).

if I go on eliminating the incorrect answers, I will mark all of them out.

Please suggest!
I have started to realize that I am the one!!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:13 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by s_raizada » Mon May 12, 2008 1:18 pm
Magellan, you are absolutely right!

According to Eric or Stuart pronoun antecedent reference is not a grammar problem but a style problem.

The way I approach such sentences is like this
1. Is there a pronoun number agreement error? Both D and E have this problem so you can cross them out
2. Is meaning of the pronoun ambigous? For example in option B and C, they refers to depressed property values and thier refers to homowners. Therefore both options B and C are incorrect

This leaves us with option A and because it is a style problem so GMAT can live with it. In summary, it is lesser of the evils.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:33 pm

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:10 am
Location: bangalore,india

by phait » Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:42 am
hi
i wan t to reopen discussion on this thread..

if 'are calling' is a verb then why not are proposing and are suggesting appearing in the correct answer?[/quote]

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 3:01 am

by balz11 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:11 pm
I think right answer would be 'They can potentially devastate homeowners,whose'
correct me if m wrong.