Which one is better:
1. She saw a thoroughly frightened child who was cowering in the corner of the room
2. Shw saw, covering in the corner of the room, a thoroughly frightened child.
Please explain, thank
OA: 2
Barrons Test A SC Q12
which one is better
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:58 am
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:4 members
I feel the first 1 is better..
I am not able to justify why 2 is better except that 1 has the relative pronoun 'who'. Sentence 1 looks passive to me..
.. Welll, i am trying to justify since I saw the answer.. SO let me wait for others.
I am not able to justify why 2 is better except that 1 has the relative pronoun 'who'. Sentence 1 looks passive to me..
.. Welll, i am trying to justify since I saw the answer.. SO let me wait for others.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:58 am
Official explanation is as follows:
This is a suspenseful sentence because what she saw is held off to the very last word in the sentence. ...
Personally, I do consider the first setnence is more straightforward.
For second sentence, reader may misinterpret that it was the lady who was cowering in the corner rathr than the child.
This is a suspenseful sentence because what she saw is held off to the very last word in the sentence. ...
Personally, I do consider the first setnence is more straightforward.
For second sentence, reader may misinterpret that it was the lady who was cowering in the corner rathr than the child.
Last edited by nh8404052006 on Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:4 members
I will PM one of the experts to weigh in.. The OA u mentioned, cannot be gleaned in a single sentence.. We should see the entire paragraph to do that !!!.
thanks
thanks
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:58 am
The whole OE:
This is a suspenseful sentence because what she saw is held off to the very last word in the sentence. Also, an active verb, saw, is preferable to the passive was seen.
The reason I do not include the second sentence of the OE is obvious, that portion is irrelevant.
The purpose of this posting is to find out whether sentence 2 is better than sentence 1, if so, what is the (grammatical) reasons behind it? If not, why is sentence 1 better than sentence 2?
Any guru, please comment.
This is a suspenseful sentence because what she saw is held off to the very last word in the sentence. Also, an active verb, saw, is preferable to the passive was seen.
The reason I do not include the second sentence of the OE is obvious, that portion is irrelevant.
The purpose of this posting is to find out whether sentence 2 is better than sentence 1, if so, what is the (grammatical) reasons behind it? If not, why is sentence 1 better than sentence 2?
Any guru, please comment.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:25 pm
- Thanked: 9 times
- GMAT Score:730
If OA is B, throw Barrons away!
She saw, covering in the corner of the room, a thoroughly frightened child.
This has two interpretations
1) She saw ( as she was covering in the corner of the room) a frightened child
OR
2) She saw ( a thoroughly frightened child covering in the corner of the room)
The covering in the corner of the room is a misplaced modifier and here can modify both ( child and "she")
She saw, covering in the corner of the room, a thoroughly frightened child.
This has two interpretations
1) She saw ( as she was covering in the corner of the room) a frightened child
OR
2) She saw ( a thoroughly frightened child covering in the corner of the room)
The covering in the corner of the room is a misplaced modifier and here can modify both ( child and "she")
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
- Thanked: 16 times
My 2 cents...
I think question is testing our knowledge of essential vs. non essential modifiers.
Based on my understanding "covering in the corner of the room" is non essential for the meaning of this sentence.
I think question is testing our knowledge of essential vs. non essential modifiers.
Based on my understanding "covering in the corner of the room" is non essential for the meaning of this sentence.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 12 times
I think if the sentence isIf OA is B, throw Barrons away!
1) She saw ( as she was covering in the corner of the room) a frightened child
OR
The covering in the corner of the room is a misplaced modifier and here can modify both ( child and "she")
She, covering in the corner of the room, saw a thoroughly frightened child
then only sentence modifies She as mentioned in 1. I don't agree that it is a case of misplaced modifier. phrase is modifying the "She saw" i.e child.
Pls comment.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
ugh, #2 is horribly awkward.
a major publisher seriously printed something that quoted this as a correct answer?
dear lord.
the best way to write this would be the first way, minus the unnecessary words:
she saw a thoroughly frightened child cowering in the corner of the room.
there's no ambiguity as to who's cowering in the corner here; since there's no comma preceding the modifier, it must modify the immediately preceding noun (= frightened child).
a major publisher seriously printed something that quoted this as a correct answer?
dear lord.
the best way to write this would be the first way, minus the unnecessary words:
she saw a thoroughly frightened child cowering in the corner of the room.
there's no ambiguity as to who's cowering in the corner here; since there's no comma preceding the modifier, it must modify the immediately preceding noun (= frightened child).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron