(A) includes
(B) include

Gee! Thanks Bidisha800! How could I be so stupid. It all makes perfect sense now

linfongyu wrote:Gee! Thanks Bidisha800! How could I be so stupid. It all makes perfect sense now

Jeez ..... It will make even more sense if you grab a grammar book and read a little ..

bidish why are you so sarcastic on so many of the replies? You may be a smart person but don't think that everyone's capable like you.

So let's all grab grammar books and there would be no need for such message boards... :roll:

I gave a curt response because I was asking for an explanation, rather than just an answer. I have the answer key already!

So, oh wise one, if you can enlighten me with your thought process, or a set of rules that I could use if I were to encounter different sentences with similar structure in the future, I would be temporarily grateful. Or, should I need to look into grammar books, what is this clause/phrase structure called? Surely it isn't called a "which clause."

Thanks in advance.

linfongyu wrote:So let's all grab grammar books and there would be no need for such message boards... :roll:

Thanks in advance.

The day this message board could replace a grammar book, I'll rent a gun, buy a bullet and kill myself.

Gmatss wrote:bidish why are you so sarcastic on so many of the replies? You may be a smart person but don't think that everyone's capable like you.

God bless you, I think everyone is more capable than I am.

2
which will refer to "the effects of bacterial deterioration"
if i remove prepositional clause "of bacterial deterioration" [prepositional clauses needs to be removed while deciding subject ver agreement]
so which refers to effects

hence "include" is correct


1
similarly
which refers to "list of writers who never won"
again remove "of writers who never won"
so list si singular
hence includes


A small point to make it more clear
list of writers who have never won
I used have because who refers to writers

Hope this helps

Thanks, stop@800. You rock!

To recap:

For non-restrictive relative causes, those normally preceded by a comma, the verb must agree with the preceding noun, stripping away the prepositional phrases.

For restrictive relative causes, those normally without the commas, the verb can agree with either the preceding noun or the object of the preposition depending on its modifier. So watch the hell out!

Good one, will keep this in mind

Good one, will keep this in mind