BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Where to target studying? Confusing pratice scores.

Expert replies
by odonneld » Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:51 pm
I have done practice tests to try and find out where my natural skills are, however, I have been rather confused by the results.

I have done 3 practice exams (2 Kaplan, 1 MGMAT):

Kaplan 1: 610 (Q33 39%, V44 97%)
Kaplan 2: 630 (Q34 41%, V49 99%)
ManhattanGMAT: 670 (Q44 73%, V37 83%)

Clearly my strength lies in the verbal arena and not the quantitative.

My original plan after the Kaplan exams was to focus only on math, since the difference in Q and V scores is very extreme and clearly consistent.

However my score is much more balanced on the Manhattan exam which makes me think I should split my time more equally.

I did not expect the scores to correlate score wise but I expected consistancy in "Weak" and "strong" areas. I did not expect a drastic upswing in my "weak" subject and drastic downswing in my "strong" one.

Does anyone have any advice / insight into my situation?
Any help in figuring out what the swing means and what my study plan should be would be much appreciated.



Thanks!!
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by beatthegmat » Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:17 pm
Have you seen this website to help you create your study plan? https://beatthegmat.blocked
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team

Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses

Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
Join the discussion

by lastday » Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:18 am
Do not base any study plans on a Kaplan test score!!! Read around the forums...most people here say that Kaplan tests are not anything like the real thing. MGMAT is better for sure, but you should take MATPrep for the best indicator.

HOWEVER...stop taking tests altogether until you spend some significant time working on untimed practice questions and learning GMAT strategies. Don't neglect verbal, but definitely focus more on quant.
Join the discussion