Hi folk / Experts,
As I mentioned here that my verbal score has stuck up at 28 even after preparing for a year (although not continuous due to involvement in the work), I don't know what to do next and how to proceed ahead. I am really seeking to take my verbal score to 40.
I have taken Four MGMAT's test in the recent 6 months and score varies from 570 - 590 and verbal in the range of 26-28 (although it improved from first ever test of MGMAT, which was 17).
Courses followed - MGMAT SC, OG 12 (Verbal more than twice), Powerscore CR, RC - Kaplan Verbal Course booklet.
Time of preparation (within tight schedule due to work) - Only 2 hrs (1 hr in morning and 1 in evening).
Please suggest where am i lacking and how should i go forward ?
Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Jay
Verbal Score Stuck up at 28, Please advice.
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:06 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:43 pm
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:31 members
Hey Jay,
My verbal wasn't originally that great either, but I think it comes down to how you "view" the material (and what types of wrong answers you're picking). I've used the empower gmat course and it's helped a lot (plus it's a monthly subscription, so you don't have to spend a ton of time or money if you don't want to). The verbal guy Max really simplifies what it takes to get the points - it's the most straight-forward way that I've ever seen to handle verbal questions.
-Josh
My verbal wasn't originally that great either, but I think it comes down to how you "view" the material (and what types of wrong answers you're picking). I've used the empower gmat course and it's helped a lot (plus it's a monthly subscription, so you don't have to spend a ton of time or money if you don't want to). The verbal guy Max really simplifies what it takes to get the points - it's the most straight-forward way that I've ever seen to handle verbal questions.
-Josh
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
i received a private message about this thread.
to the original poster -- you wrote:
basically, you've just listed a bunch of overall scores and general resources. there's no insight whatsoever into the following:
* what have you done with those resources? how have you studied?
* in what areas are you stronger? weaker?
* how have you adapted your studying to your current results?
etc.
i wrote some general advice for the verbal section in the following post; you may want to check it out:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/retaking-gma ... tml#464164
to the original poster -- you wrote:
the problem, here, is that this thread contains absolutely no information or observations that could be used to answer this question. in other words, it's impossible to give any specific response to this question, because i don't know anything about your situation.Please suggest where am i lacking
basically, you've just listed a bunch of overall scores and general resources. there's no insight whatsoever into the following:
* what have you done with those resources? how have you studied?
* in what areas are you stronger? weaker?
* how have you adapted your studying to your current results?
etc.
i wrote some general advice for the verbal section in the following post; you may want to check it out:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/retaking-gma ... tml#464164
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:06 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Thanks Ron for replying as I was waiting it.
First of all I am a non-native speaker of English.
My accuracy went up from 20-30 % to 60 % and then stagnant.
CR - Earlier, even after going through Powerscore - CR bible I used to jump on the answers choices straight away after reading the Stimulus. Then started building the habit of thinking of the main issue and score improved slightly from 40 % accuracy to 50 %. (Courses followed - OG 10 / 12)
RC - Just go through the passage to get the main point first by eliminating the unwanted details and prioritizing the keywords and then get to the details and inference question. (Accuracy remains Unchanged i.e. 50%)(Courses followed - OG 12)
and weaker in CR and RC.
Thanks again RON for your billion dollar guidance.
Very True, but here i am going to give you a debrief of your question.the problem, here, is that this thread contains absolutely no information or observations that could be used to answer this question. in other words, it's impossible to give any specific response to this question, because i don't know anything about your situation.
First of all I am a non-native speaker of English.
SC - Sincerely followed the MGMAT SC (4th Edition/2012) solving the questions (OG 12) Chapter / Topic wise. Went through some of the Fantastic video of THURSDAY WITH RON.* what have you done with those resources? how have you studied?
My accuracy went up from 20-30 % to 60 % and then stagnant.
CR - Earlier, even after going through Powerscore - CR bible I used to jump on the answers choices straight away after reading the Stimulus. Then started building the habit of thinking of the main issue and score improved slightly from 40 % accuracy to 50 %. (Courses followed - OG 10 / 12)
RC - Just go through the passage to get the main point first by eliminating the unwanted details and prioritizing the keywords and then get to the details and inference question. (Accuracy remains Unchanged i.e. 50%)(Courses followed - OG 12)
I think stronger in SC (Comparatively in all three sections)* in what areas are you stronger? weaker?
and weaker in CR and RC.
That it what i could not able to figure it out.* how have you adapted your studying to your current results?
Thanks again RON for your billion dollar guidance.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
some thoughts here:
if "topic-wise" means that you looked at lists of problems by topic, and then went and did the problems in the list, ... well, that's not a great way to do things.
the problem, of course, is that most of the difficulty/challenge in SC lies in recognizing the concepts that are being tested. the concepts themselves are all pretty simple; it's finding them that is the issue.
so, if you are going through a list of problems that are all guaranteed to contain the same topic, that's basically "cheating", in the sense that you're giving yourself an unfair advantage that you simply won't have on test day.
if you are seriously struggling with a certain topic, then it makes sense to do a few problems from a list, just to give yourself a better orientation in that topic.
but, as soon as you are off the ground even a little bit, you should try to recognize the topic(s) WITHOUT reading the problem numbers off a list. because that's what you're going to have to do on test day.
if you want to do things topic-wise, try this:
* go through a bunch of problems WITHOUT a list
* focus on one topic, and ignore all other topics
* look for your one topic
* eliminate what you can
* QUIT (don't bother solving the rest of the problem)
* check to make sure you didn't eliminate the right answer
* move on.
if you do this, then you'll have 100% focus on one topic, and you'll definitely get better at that topic. yes, it's somewhat annoying that you won't be solving entire problems, but focus is really the only way to get better at, well, anything.
maybe it's a language/wording issue. to me, "courses" means "test-prep courses offered by companies like MGMAT" -- so that books are not "courses".
did you actually take a course associated with the OG? or is this just a way of saying that you went through the book and solved a bunch of problems.
* did you review the problems?
* if you reviewed them, did you try to find other ways to solve them, and/or approach them with techniques that you didn't use when you were solving them the first time around?
... also, it's generally a good idea to read the question part of the CR problem first, and then the passage.
i'm not sure whether you are doing this or not, because i don't know whether "the stimulus" means the question part or the passage itself. but, you should read the question first, because then you'll know how you need to read the passage, and what you have to focus on.
if you just read the passage first, then your reading will probably be somewhat disjointed/unfocused, because you won't know what you're supposed to do with the passage yet.
so... the wisdom of this plan depends on exactly what you mean by "topic-wise".coolmrityu wrote: SC - Sincerely followed the MGMAT SC (4th Edition/2012) solving the questions (OG 12) Chapter / Topic wise. Went through some of the Fantastic video of THURSDAY WITH RON.
if "topic-wise" means that you looked at lists of problems by topic, and then went and did the problems in the list, ... well, that's not a great way to do things.
the problem, of course, is that most of the difficulty/challenge in SC lies in recognizing the concepts that are being tested. the concepts themselves are all pretty simple; it's finding them that is the issue.
so, if you are going through a list of problems that are all guaranteed to contain the same topic, that's basically "cheating", in the sense that you're giving yourself an unfair advantage that you simply won't have on test day.
if you are seriously struggling with a certain topic, then it makes sense to do a few problems from a list, just to give yourself a better orientation in that topic.
but, as soon as you are off the ground even a little bit, you should try to recognize the topic(s) WITHOUT reading the problem numbers off a list. because that's what you're going to have to do on test day.
if you want to do things topic-wise, try this:
* go through a bunch of problems WITHOUT a list
* focus on one topic, and ignore all other topics
* look for your one topic
* eliminate what you can
* QUIT (don't bother solving the rest of the problem)
* check to make sure you didn't eliminate the right answer
* move on.
if you do this, then you'll have 100% focus on one topic, and you'll definitely get better at that topic. yes, it's somewhat annoying that you won't be solving entire problems, but focus is really the only way to get better at, well, anything.
i don't understand what "courses followed -- OG 10/12" means.CR - Earlier, even after going through Powerscore - CR bible I used to jump on the answers choices straight away after reading the Stimulus. Then started building the habit of thinking of the main issue and score improved slightly from 40 % accuracy to 50 %. (Courses followed - OG 10 / 12)
maybe it's a language/wording issue. to me, "courses" means "test-prep courses offered by companies like MGMAT" -- so that books are not "courses".
did you actually take a course associated with the OG? or is this just a way of saying that you went through the book and solved a bunch of problems.
* did you review the problems?
* if you reviewed them, did you try to find other ways to solve them, and/or approach them with techniques that you didn't use when you were solving them the first time around?
... also, it's generally a good idea to read the question part of the CR problem first, and then the passage.
i'm not sure whether you are doing this or not, because i don't know whether "the stimulus" means the question part or the passage itself. but, you should read the question first, because then you'll know how you need to read the passage, and what you have to focus on.
if you just read the passage first, then your reading will probably be somewhat disjointed/unfocused, because you won't know what you're supposed to do with the passage yet.
sorry, i don't understand this sentence -- a typo, perhaps?That it what i could not able to figure it out.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron