• Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • The Princeton Review
    FREE GMAT Exam
    Know how you'd score today for $0

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    The Princeton Review
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider

Verbal Review 18 : Kudzu, an Asian vine

This topic has 3 expert replies and 3 member replies

Top Member

NandishSS Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
05 Jun 2015
Posted:
344 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
3
Most Conversational Member

Verbal Review 18 : Kudzu, an Asian vine

Post Thu Oct 26, 2017 2:33 am
Kudzu, an Asian vine that has grown rampantly in the southern United States since introducing it in the 1920s to thwart soil erosion, has overrun many houses and countless acres of roadside.

(A) that has grown rampantly in the southern United States since introducing it in the 1920s to thwart
(B) that has grown rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s for thwarting
(C) that has grown rampant in the southern United States since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
(D) growing rampant in the southern United States since introducing it in the 1920s for thwarting
(E) growing rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart

OA: C

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Top Reply
Post Thu Oct 26, 2017 3:53 am
NandishSS wrote:
Kudzu, an Asian vine that has grown rampantly in the southern United States since introducing it in the 1920s to thwart soil erosion, has overrun many houses and countless acres of roadside.

(A) that has grown rampantly in the southern United States since introducing it in the 1920s to thwart
(B) that has grown rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s for thwarting
(C) that has grown rampant in the southern United States since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
(D) growing rampant in the southern United States since introducing it in the 1920s for thwarting
(E) growing rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
A: Kudzu...has grown...since introducing it
D: Kudzu...growing...since introducing it
In these options, Kudzu seems to be both the agent of introducing and the referent for it, implying that KUDZU IS INTRODUCING KUDZU.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate A and D.

Generally, for + VERBING cannot serve to express intent.
B: it was introduced...for thwarting soil erosion
Here, for thwarting incorrectly serves to express the intent of whoever introduced Kudzu.
To express this intent, we use to + VERB, as in the OA:
it was introduced TO THWART soil erosion.
Eliminate B.

One purpose of the present perfect -- has/have + VERBed -- is to express an action that STARTED IN THE PAST AND CONTINUES IN THE PRESENT.
E: growing...since...the 1920s
Here, the modifier in red implies that the act of growing started in the past and continues in the present.
For this reason, this action must be expressed as a present perfect verb:
Kudzu...HAS GROWN...since...the 1920s
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.

rampant is an ADJECTIVE that means uncontrolled.
rampantly is an ADVERB that means in an controlled way.
In the SC above, both seem acceptable.

Correct: Kudzu has grown rampant.
Here, rampant is an ADJECTIVE serving to modify Kudzu.
The conveyed meaning is that -- as a result of the action in blue -- Kudzu is now UNCONTROLLED.

Correct: Kudzu has grown rampantly.
Here, rampantly is an ADVERB serving to modify has grown.
The conveyed meaning is that Kudzu has grown IN AN UNCONTROLLED MANNER.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.



Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:23 am; edited 1 time in total

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

Top Member

NandishSS Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
05 Jun 2015
Posted:
344 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
3
Most Conversational Member
Post Thu Oct 26, 2017 4:13 am
HI Mitch,

Is it not Kudzu, act of growing started in the past and continues still in the present.

Is the act still in progress(present)?

Where am I going wrong?

Thanks
Nandish

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Post Thu Oct 26, 2017 4:40 am
NandishSS wrote:
HI Mitch,

Is it not Kudzu, act of growing started in the past and continues still in the present.

Is the act still in progress(present)?

Where am I going wrong?

Thanks
Nandish
Generally, a VERBing modifier expresses an action that is CONTEMPORANEOUS with an actual verb.
If the actual verb happens in the past, so does the VERBing action.
E: growing...was introduced
Here, the usage of growing (VERBing modifier) seems to imply that the act of growing was CONTEMPORANEOUS with the actual verb in blue.
Since was introduced happens in the past, so should the act of growing.
Since the intended meaning is that the act of growing continues in the present, eliminate E.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
sagarock Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
11 Apr 2016
Posted:
48 messages
Post Wed Nov 08, 2017 6:06 pm
gmat guru,i understand why introducing is incorrect in sentence,but why these two sentences are correct?
1) The best way to extract the flavor from saffron threads is to soak them in liquid after pounding them
2)The tablet must not be taken before getting up in the morning.
And,are there more questions in og that test this concept?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Post Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:59 am
sagarock wrote:
gmat guru,i understand why introducing is incorrect in sentence,but why these two sentences are correct?
1) The best way to extract the flavor from saffron threads is to soak them in liquid after pounding them
2)The tablet must not be taken before getting up in the morning.
And,are there more questions in og that test this concept?
The best way to extract the flavor from saffron threads is to soak them in liquid after pounding them.
Here, the action in blue lacks an explicit agent.
As a result, the following is implied:
The best way [for a person] to extract the flavor from saffron threads is to soak them in liquid after pounding them.
The implication is that the implied PERSON in brackets is performing all three actions (to extract, to soak, pounding).
Thus, the act of POUNDING has a clear and logical agent: the implied person in brackets.

SC11 in the OG12 is similar:
There are several ways [for a person] to build solid walls using just mud or clay, but the most extensively used method has been to form the mud or clay into bricks, and, after some preliminary air drying or sun drying, to lay them in the wall in mud mortar.
Here, all of the actions in blue are performed by the implied person in brackets.
Thus, the act of DRYING has a clear and logical agent: the implied person in brackets.

Quote:
2)The tablet must not be taken before getting up in the morning.
Here, the main action -- must not be taken -- has an explicit agent: the tablet.
As a result, the TABLET seems also to be the agent of getting, implying that the TABLET is GETTING up in the morning -- clearly not the intended meaning.
For this reason, the sentence above would be considered incorrect on the GMAT.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
oneniceshoot Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
13 Nov 2017
Posted:
1 messages
Post Mon Nov 13, 2017 5:28 am
[quote="GMATGuruNY"]for + VERBING is an ADJECTIVE.
It must serve to modify a NOUN.
It cannot serve to modify a VERB.
B: was introduced...for thwarting
Here, for thwarting (adjective) cannot serve to modify was introduced (verb).
Eliminate B.

Thanks for your detailed answers.

You have mentioned that for + VERBING is an ADJECTIVE.It must serve to modify a NOUN.

Would you please give any explanation or example about this principle? I am really confused about it. Thanks so much for your time!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Top First Responders*

1 GMATGuruNY 70 first replies
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma... 42 first replies
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow 40 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 24 first replies
5 Terry@ThePrinceto... 10 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

Most Active Experts

1 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

133 posts
2 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

113 posts
3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

111 posts
4 image description Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

111 posts
5 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

90 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts