Is n > 6?
1. sqrt(n) > 2.5
2.n > sqrt(37)
[spoiler]I see A is sufficient. However, when it comes to st 2 , n > sqrt(37) translates to n^2 > 6 . So n is either greater than 6 or less than -6. So the answer must be A right?[/spoiler]
Value of n
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
- vinay1983
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
- Thanked: 48 times
- Followed by:7 members
Hmm, I feel it is as below:
Statement A
Sqrt(n) > 2.5
This can mean N can also be 6 or 7 or 8 Not sufficient
Statement B
N > sqrt (37)
Sqrt 37 yields little more than 6, hence N has to be more than 6 Sufficient
Statement A
Sqrt(n) > 2.5
This can mean N can also be 6 or 7 or 8 Not sufficient
Statement B
N > sqrt (37)
Sqrt 37 yields little more than 6, hence N has to be more than 6 Sufficient
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: Is 6 < n?Deepthi Subbu wrote:Is n > 6?
1) √n > 2.5
2) n > √37
Statement 1: √n > 2.5
Since (2.5)² = 6.25, we know that √6.25 = 2.5
If √n is GREATER THAN 2.5, we know that n must be GREATER THAN 6.25
So, 6.25 < n
Since 6 < 6.25, we get 6 < 6.25 < n
So, it must be the case that Is 6 < n
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: n > √37
We know that √36 < √37
So, if √37 < n, we can write √36 < √37 < n
So, √36 < n
Since √36 = 6, we can be certain that 6 < n
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = D
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Deepthi Subbu,
By definition, the square root of a number can only be POSITIVE.
So sqrt(37) must be positive and a little greater than 6.
By comparison, if you were told that N^2 > 6, then N COULD BE positive or negative.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
By definition, the square root of a number can only be POSITIVE.
So sqrt(37) must be positive and a little greater than 6.
By comparison, if you were told that N^2 > 6, then N COULD BE positive or negative.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi vinay1983,
I hope you read through Bren't explanation, because you made a math mistake in your approach and it would have cost you this question.
Since (2.5)^2 = 6.25, Fact 1 proves that n > 6 and would be considered SUFFICIENT on its own!
You must be willing to do the necessary math (and do it correctly) if you want to hit 700+ on Test Day.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
I hope you read through Bren't explanation, because you made a math mistake in your approach and it would have cost you this question.
Since (2.5)^2 = 6.25, Fact 1 proves that n > 6 and would be considered SUFFICIENT on its own!
You must be willing to do the necessary math (and do it correctly) if you want to hit 700+ on Test Day.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- vinay1983
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
- Thanked: 48 times
- Followed by:7 members
Yes you are right, this was a yes/no question.I mistook it for a value question!Point taken![email protected] wrote:Hi vinay1983,
I hope you read through Bren't explanation, because you made a math mistake in your approach and it would have cost you this question.
Since (2.5)^2 = 6.25, Fact 1 proves that n > 6 and would be considered SUFFICIENT on its own!
You must be willing to do the necessary math (and do it correctly) if you want to hit 700+ on Test Day.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
No, √36 does not equal 6 and -6ani781 wrote:Hi ,
I am little confused with the statement D.
Why is it not that n > 36^1/2 => n > +6 / -6.
Is not sqrt of 36 = +/- 6 ?
Pls explain what am I missing here.
√n denotes the positive number whose square is n.
So, √36 = 6 (and only 6)
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
This all has to do with agreed-upon notation. From the Official Guide:ani781 wrote:Thanks Brent, but please elaborate a little more... Is not -6 * -6 = 36 ?
Is it then |sqrt 36| which gives +6 / -6 ?
Where lies the difference between them ?
A square root of a number n is a number that, when squared, is equal to n. Every positive number n has two square roots, one positive and the other negative, but √n denotes the positive number whose square is n. For example, √9 denotes 3.
Cheers,
Brent
- ani781
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:35 am
- Location: Edison
- Thanked: 12 times
- Followed by:1 members
Thanks a lot Brent.... This was a piece I had overlooked ... could you kindly guide me to any such more assumptions if any... I would be grateful...
Best Regards.
Best Regards.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
I can't think of any other assumptions regarding square roots.ani781 wrote:Thanks a lot Brent.... This was a piece I had overlooked ... could you kindly guide me to any such more assumptions if any... I would be grateful...
Best Regards.
I guess there's this fact: the square root of a negative number is not a real number.
Cheers,
Brent