BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

USS Harvard

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
Expert replies
by anthoj » Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:12 pm
Scientists believe they have discovered the wreck of the USS Harvard, sunk by Japanese torpedoes during World War II. Their conclusions are drawn from underwater searches by mini-submarine of the are about 4 miles west of Midway Island in the Pacific Ocean during what started out as offshore oil platform accident procedures. There are some military historians that are skeptical about the scientists' claim, on the basis that sophisticated sonar equipment has not identified the ship as, indeed, the Harvard.

Which of the following, if true, would weaken the historians' arguments?

(A) Thorough searching by divers and bathyscopes has not located the wreck
(B) Three other ships were sunk in this area during World War II
(C) The ship's last known position was 20 miles east of Midway
(D) The use of sonar only enables the user to identify the shape and dimension of a wreck
(E) It is not known whether the Harvard suffered much structural damage before being sunk

According to answer, it should be D
Join the discussion
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |

by kstv » Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:11 am
There are some military historians that are skeptical about the scientists' claim, on the basis that sophisticated sonar equipment has not identified the ship as, indeed, the Harvard. Option (D) clarifies that sonar can identity the shape and dimension that the broad outlines not anything more specific to identify. The scientist must made used other inferences like whether the location matches the last sighting reports etc.
It is repeated that u look for key words in the Argument. Here ''only'' in (D) is a key word.
Which of the following, if true, would weaken the historians' arguments?
(A) Thorough searching by divers and bathyscopes has not located the wreck. Strengthens
(B) Three other ships were sunk in this area during World War II. -- Strengthens as the ship may be the other two.
(C) The ship's last known position was 20 miles east of Midway- Strengthens as the wreck is 24 miles from this point.
(D) The use of sonar only enables the user to identify the shape and dimension of a wreck
(E) It is not known whether the Harvard suffered much structural damage before being sunk . No bearing on the argument.
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Sat May 22, 2010 1:05 pm
If the ship was sunk by torpedoes, there's a good chance that the ship would have suffered structural damage, making it difficult to identify based on shape and dimension. Therefore, if D were true and the sonar could only identify shape and dimension, the sonar wouldn't necessarily be able to identify the ship. D therefore weakens the historians' argument.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by neerajbansal » Sun May 23, 2010 3:24 pm
(A) Thorough searching by divers and bathyscopes has not located the wreck ...
Out Of Scope �

(B) Three other ships were sunk in this area during World War II
thats a lot of info..can we talk about the ship please..

(C) The ship's last known position was 20 miles east of Midway
SO..it drifted while it was sinking �

(D) The use of sonar only enables the user to identify the shape and dimension of a wreck
Hmmm..Cream of the crap..All other either strengthen or are WMD ( Weapons of mass distraction ( just love this term) ..saw this on the forum somewhere...

(E) It is not known whether the Harvard suffered much structural damage before being sunk
Does it really matter..
Join the discussion