Hi
Need your help regarding this one. I chose C but OA states otherwise.
A university should not be entitled to patent the inventions of its faculty members. Universities, as guarantors of intellectual freedom, should encourage the free flow of ideas and the general dissemination of knowledge. Yet a university that retains the right to patent the inventions of its faculty members has a motive to suppress information about a potentially valuable discovery until the patent for it has been secured. Clearly, suppressing information concerning such discoveries is incompatible with the university's obligation to promote the free flow of ideas.
Which one of the following is an assumption that the argument makes?
(A) Universities are the only institutions that have an obligation to guarantee intellectual freedom.
(B) Most inventions by university faculty members would be profitable if patented.
(C) Publication of reports on research is the only practical way to disseminate information concerning new discoveries.
(D) Universities that have a motive to suppress information concerning discoveries by their faculty members will occasionally act on that motive.
(E) If the inventions of a university faculty member are not patented by that university, then they will be patented by the faculty member instead.
Thanks,
user123321
University
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:02 pm
- Thanked: 62 times
- Followed by:6 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 8:05 pm
- Thanked: 26 times
- Followed by:4 members
I chose D. What's the OA ?user123321 wrote:Hi
Need your help regarding this one. I chose C but OA states otherwise.
A university should not be entitled to patent the inventions of its faculty members. Universities, as guarantors of intellectual freedom, should encourage the free flow of ideas and the general dissemination of knowledge. Yet a university that retains the right to patent the inventions of its faculty members has a motive to suppress information about a potentially valuable discovery until the patent for it has been secured. Clearly, suppressing information concerning such discoveries is incompatible with the university's obligation to promote the free flow of ideas.
Which one of the following is an assumption that the argument makes?
(A) Universities are the only institutions that have an obligation to guarantee intellectual freedom.
(B) Most inventions by university faculty members would be profitable if patented.
(C) Publication of reports on research is the only practical way to disseminate information concerning new discoveries.
(D) Universities that have a motive to suppress information concerning discoveries by their faculty members will occasionally act on that motive.
(E) If the inventions of a university faculty member are not patented by that university, then they will be patented by the faculty member instead.
Thanks,
user123321
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:02 pm
- Thanked: 62 times
- Followed by:6 members
@chieftang
you're right Could you care to give us explanation for this?
Thanks
user123321
you're right Could you care to give us explanation for this?
Thanks
user123321
Just started my preparation
Want to do it right the first time.
Want to do it right the first time.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 8:05 pm
- Thanked: 26 times
- Followed by:4 members
user123321 wrote:Hi
Need your help regarding this one. I chose C but OA states otherwise.
A university should not be entitled to patent the inventions of its faculty members. Universities, as guarantors of intellectual freedom, should encourage the free flow of ideas and the general dissemination of knowledge. Yet a university that retains the right to patent the inventions of its faculty members has a motive to suppress information about a potentially valuable discovery until the patent for it has been secured. Clearly, suppressing information concerning such discoveries is incompatible with the university's obligation to promote the free flow of ideas.
Which one of the following is an assumption that the argument makes?
(A) Universities are the only institutions that have an obligation to guarantee intellectual freedom.
The article concentrates on Universities, but doesn't imply or state they're the *only* institutions that have such an obligation.
(B) Most inventions by university faculty members would be profitable if patented.
The article is concerned about information dissemination, not about profit.
(C) Publication of reports on research is the only practical way to disseminate information concerning new discoveries.
The article doesn't concern itself with the method of information dissemination, and certainly no assumption is made that there is only one practical method.
(D) Universities that have a motive to suppress information concerning discoveries by their faculty members will occasionally act on that motive.
If there was no assumption that motive might be acted upon, then there'd be no need to restrict Universities from patenting inventions. So clearly this assumption is being made!
(E) If the inventions of a university faculty member are not patented by that university, then they will be patented by the faculty member instead.
No such assumption is being conveyed.
Thanks,
user123321
Last edited by chieftang on Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
- Thanked: 13 times
- Followed by:3 members
Negating D does make the conclusion less likely. Just substitute NOT in place of Occasionally. If the university that has the motive does not act on that motive, then the university does not suppress information even if it has a motive to do so. So, the conclusion that supressing is against the obligation does not hold good because there is no suppression.
However, the other answer choices are distinctly irrelevant to command a Negation.
However, the other answer choices are distinctly irrelevant to command a Negation.
- ronnie1985
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 am
- Location: Ahmedabad
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:10 members
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:44 pm
This is a confusing question. Is this an official question.
D seems to be the closest but does not seem to be an assumption.
D seems to be the closest but does not seem to be an assumption.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:47 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
The answer is (D)..due to the following reason
This is an ASSUMPTION question
"The University has a motive and occasionally can act on that motive".. ASSUMPTION to make the argument flow logical to the conclusion
This is an ASSUMPTION question
"The University has a motive and occasionally can act on that motive".. ASSUMPTION to make the argument flow logical to the conclusion