Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

united states mint

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:39 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 7 times
by zaarathelab » Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:38 pm
Officials at the United States Mint believe that the Sacagawea dollar coin will be used more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than four quarters, which weigh 5.67 grams each.

A) more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than

B) more as a substitute for four quarters than the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far lighter than

C) as a substitute for four quarters more than for the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than

D) as a substitute for four quarters more than the dollar bill because its weight of only 8.1 grams is far lighter than it is for

E) as a substitute more for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than it is for

OA IS C
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 amFollowed by: 43 members
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:59 pm
Officials at the United States Mint believe that the Sacagawea dollar coin will be used more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than four quarters, which weigh 5.67 grams each.

A) more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than

B) more as a substitute for four quarters than the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far lighter than

C) as a substitute for four quarters more than for the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than - CORRECT CONSTRUCTION

D) as a substitute for four quarters more than the dollar bill because its weight of only 8.1 grams is far lighter than it is for - RUN ON

E) as a substitute more for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than it is for

IMO:C
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times

by aspirant2011 » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:49 am
Hi GMAT Kiss,

Can you please explain a little bit more in detail i.e why "more as a substitute for 4 quarters is wrong" ?
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pmFollowed by: 512 members
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:55 am
By placing "more" at the beginning you set up the contrast to begin right there and it does not work.

Look at B, you would need to say "more as a substitute for four quarters than as a substitute for the dollar bill. In italics is what is missing if you begin the contrast to early.

Whereas with choice C, the "more" comes after the phrase "as a substitute" and so this is distributed to both parts of the comparison. Replacing the words with x and y we can say "as a substitute for x more than (implied: as a substitute) for y"

Does that make sense?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 amFollowed by: 8 members
Thanked: 37 times

by saketk » Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:03 am
aspirant2011 wrote:Hi GMAT Kiss,

Can you please explain a little bit more in detail i.e why "more as a substitute for 4 quarters is wrong" ?
I feel "more as a substitute" and "as a substitute more" -- both have different meanings.
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times

by aspirant2011 » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:36 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:By placing "more" at the beginning you set up the contrast to begin right there and it does not work.

Look at B, you would need to say "more as a substitute for four quarters than as a substitute for the dollar bill. In italics is what is missing if you begin the contrast to early.

Whereas with choice C, the "more" comes after the phrase "as a substitute" and so this is distributed to both parts of the comparison. Replacing the words with x and y we can say "as a substitute for x more than (implied: as a substitute) for y"

Does that make sense?
thanks a lot David :)
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:29 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by nandy1984 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:40 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:By placing "more" at the beginning you set up the contrast to begin right there and it does not work.

Look at B, you would need to say "more as a substitute for four quarters than as a substitute for the dollar bill. In italics is what is missing if you begin the contrast to early.

Whereas with choice C, the "more" comes after the phrase "as a substitute" and so this is distributed to both parts of the comparison. Replacing the words with x and y we can say "as a substitute for x more than (implied: as a substitute) for y"

Does that make sense?
In addition to what David said we can also eliminate the choices based on "its weight...only" which is wrong...."it weighs...only" is correct...so with this we can eliminate A,D,E...We will be left with B,C...Then we can apply the priciple David has explained to us...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If iam wrong please correct if i am correct and it helped plz hit Thanks :)
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times

by aspirant2011 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:48 am
Hi David,

I have one doubt i.e isn't More X than Y the right usage?????
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 233 times
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:55 am
aspirant2011 wrote:Hi David,

I have one doubt i.e isn't More X than Y the right usage?????
Yes see OG 12 diagnostic problem 48.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pmFollowed by: 512 members
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:58 am
Certainly "more x than y" is correct in general.

In this case however, B says "more as a substitute for X than Y" This is not parallel and is also not logical in meaning. You need to say "more as a substitute for x than as a substitute for y."

Or you can say, as the correct answer does, "As a substitute for x more than for y."

So in general you are correct but make sure you have the same things being compared for x and y. When you take things down to "x" and "y" they need be parallel. You could take "baskets of apples" and "bags of oranges" down to "x" and "y." But you could not take "salaries of vice-presidents" and "executives" down to "x" and "y." Because they are not parallel.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times

by aspirant2011 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:02 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:Certainly "more x than y" is correct in general.

In this case however, B says "more as a substitute for X than Y" This is not parallel and is also not logical in meaning. You need to say "more as a substitute for x than as a substitute for y."

Or you can say, as the correct answer does, "As a substitute for x more than for y."

So in general you are correct but make sure you have the same things being compared for x and y. When you take things down to "x" and "y" they need be parallel. You could take "baskets of apples" and "bags of oranges" down to "x" and "y." But you could not take "salaries of vice-presidents" and "executives" down to "x" and "y." Because they are not parallel.
Got it thanks a lot :)............
Top
Join the discussion