BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

United Lumber

Expert replies
by queenisabella » Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:13 pm
United Lumber will use trees from its forests for two products. The tree trunks will be used for lumber and the branches converted into wood chips to make fiberboard. The cost of this conversion would be the same whether done at the logging site, where the trees are debranched, or at United's factory. However, wood chips occupy less than half the volume of the branches from which they are made.
The information given, if accurate, most strongly supports which of the following?

A) Converting the branches into wood chips at the logging site would require transporting a fully assembled wood-chipping machine to and from the site.
B) It would be more economical to debranch the trees at the factory where the fiberboard is manufactured.
C) The debranching of trees and the conversion of the branches into chips are the only stages in the processing of branches that it would be in United's economic advantage to perform at the logging site.
D) Transportation costs from the logging site to the factory that are determined by volume of cargo would be lower if the conversion into chips is done at the logging site rather than at the factory.
E) In the wood-processing industry, branches are used only for the production of wood chips for fiberboard.

OA is D.. I mistakenly read this question originally as strengthen vs. inference.. hence where it was difficult to identify a correct answer.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by killer1387 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:53 pm
Only D is supported by the info provided.
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:55 pm
The key here is the last sentence. If only half of the volume of the branches can be turned into wood chips, that's a lot of extra material to deal with.

D says that volume-based cargo costs would be lower if you process the branches at the site. If you process on-site, you're only sending the material to be used, which saves you half of the volume. If you send entire branches, you're paying to ship the excess material that isn't used for wood chips.

A--We have no information about the machinery requirements for wood chip conversion.
B--We have no information about the cost of debranching at the factory or at the site.
C--We don't know if there are other stages that could be economically advantageous.
E--We can't extrapolate from United Lumber to the entire wood-processing industry; we can't draw a universal conclusion from particular premises.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion