union can be a star

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

union can be a star

by sanju09 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:19 am
When two congruent equilateral triangles share a common center, then their union can be a star as shown. If their overlap is a regular hexagon of area 60, then what is the area of one of the original equilateral triangles?
(A) 10
(B) 15
(C) 30
(D) 60
(E) 90
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:23 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Haldiram Bhujiawala » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:54 am
IMO15

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:23 am
sanju09 wrote:When two congruent equilateral triangles share a common center, then their union can be a star as shown. If their overlap is a regular hexagon of area 60, then what is the area of one of the original equilateral triangles?
(A) 10
(B) 15
(C) 30
(D) 60
(E) 90
Easiest Solution:
Area of any of the original triangle must be greater than the overlapping region. Only such option is 90, i.e. option E.

Methodical Tricky Solution:
Join the center of the triangles (also of the hexagon) with the vertices of the hexagon. This will result 6 small equilateral triangles inside the hexagon, each of equal are as shown in the following figure.

Image

Now, each of these six small equilateral triangles are congruent to each of the six equilateral triangles outside the hexagon.

Now, area of hexagon = 6*(Area of an small equilateral triangle) = 60
=> Area of an small equilateral triangle = 60/6 = 10

Area of one of the original equilateral triangle = 9*(Area of an equilateral small triangle) = 90

Correct answer is E.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:32 am
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
sanju09 wrote:When two congruent equilateral triangles share a common center, then their union can be a star as shown. If their overlap is a regular hexagon of area 60, then what is the area of one of the original equilateral triangles?
(A) 10
(B) 15
(C) 30
(D) 60
(E) 90
Easiest Solution:
Area of any of the original triangle must be greater than the overlapping region. Only such option is 90, i.e. option E.

Methodical Tricky Solution:
Join the center of the triangles (also of the hexagon) with the vertices of the hexagon. This will result 6 small equilateral triangles inside the hexagon, each of equal are as shown in the following figure.

Image

Now, each of these six small equilateral triangles are congruent to each of the six equilateral triangles outside the hexagon.

Now, area of hexagon = 6*(Area of an small equilateral triangle) = 60
=> Area of an small equilateral triangle = 60/6 = 10

Area of one of the original equilateral triangle = 9*(Area of an equilateral small triangle) = 90

Correct answer is E.
your easiest solution is much appreciated because it also serves the purpose of the answer choices for why they are so made.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:23 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Haldiram Bhujiawala » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:47 am
Unfortunately I got the diagram wrong.