Unemployment Insurance

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:32 am
Thanked: 1 times

Unemployment Insurance

by deepesh.gupta » Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:58 am
Our system of unemployment insurance is self-defeating, since it requires those receiving benefits to devote their time to seeking work. We are in a period of tremendous economic change, and today an unemployed worker is probably out of work because his position has been eliminated. It would be more practical, therefore, to require the beneficiaries of unemployment insurance to enroll in classes that would teach them skills that will lead to successful self-employment.
An assumption central to following argument is that:
1) The benefits paid to an unemployed worker are drawn from the money collected from the worker during the period of his employment
2) Few industries that were important to the economy at the time the current system of unemployment insurance was created are essential in today's economic climate
3) For the system of unemployment insurance to benefit society as a whole, the interests of individual unemployed worker may have to be sacrificed
4) As the economy changes, there will be an increasing number of job opportunities available for skilled workers
5) Most of those currently receiving unemployment insurance can be adequately retrained for the jobs that will be available in near future

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:31 am
i narrowed down to 2 and 5
but finally chose 2. in 5 usage of most makes the answer very extreme
what is the OA
deepesh.gupta wrote:Our system of unemployment insurance is self-defeating, since it requires those receiving benefits to devote their time to seeking work. We are in a period of tremendous economic change, and today an unemployed worker is probably out of work because his position has been eliminated. It would be more practical, therefore, to require the beneficiaries of unemployment insurance to enroll in classes that would teach them skills that will lead to successful self-employment.
An assumption central to following argument is that:
1) The benefits paid to an unemployed worker are drawn from the money collected from the worker during the period of his employment
2) Few industries that were important to the economy at the time the current system of unemployment insurance was created are essential in today's economic climate
3) For the system of unemployment insurance to benefit society as a whole, the interests of individual unemployed worker may have to be sacrificed
4) As the economy changes, there will be an increasing number of job opportunities available for skilled workers
5) Most of those currently receiving unemployment insurance can be adequately retrained for the jobs that will be available in near future
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by Phirozz » Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:18 pm
IMO D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:18 pm

by bichoo » Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:32 am
IMO E

I almost chose D, but if you read the answer choice carefully, it states that there will be more jobs for skilled workers. I made the mistake thinking initially that the conclusion stated that enrolling in classes would teach skills for the future job. However, this is not the case as the classes will 'teach skills that will lead to successful self-employment.

Answer choice E follows the logic of D but states that the workers can be 'retrained' for the jobs that will be available in the near future. This makes more sense than D.

What is OA?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:35 am

by gmatguy81 » Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:18 am
E +1

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:21 am

by shwetathegmat » Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:04 am
IMO D
What is the OA?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:21 am

by shwetathegmat » Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:07 am
IMO D
What is the OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 5:43 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by RumpelThickSkin » Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:31 am
E + 3 ..

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:47 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by sakali » Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:48 am
deepesh.gupta wrote:Our system of unemployment insurance is self-defeating, since it requires those receiving benefits to devote their time to seeking work. We are in a period of tremendous economic change, and today an unemployed worker is probably out of work because his position has been eliminated. It would be more practical, therefore, to require the beneficiaries of unemployment insurance to enroll in classes that would teach them skills that will lead to successful self-employment.
An assumption central to following argument is that:
1) The benefits paid to an unemployed worker are drawn from the money collected from the worker during the period of his employment
2) Few industries that were important to the economy at the time the current system of unemployment insurance was created are essential in today's economic climate
3) For the system of unemployment insurance to benefit society as a whole, the interests of individual unemployed worker may have to be sacrificed
4) As the economy changes, there will be an increasing number of job opportunities available for skilled workers
5) Most of those currently receiving unemployment insurance can be adequately retrained for the jobs that will be available in near future
Looks like most people are saying "E". I'm not sure about "E" because the argument says they should be re-trained for "Self-employment"...meaning, they don't go find a job, they start their own business instead. So "E" would not be a necessary assumption. Same logic for "D".

I will go with "C".

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:18 pm

by bichoo » Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:14 am
If that is the case, self-employment = being self employed, then you could be right. The sentence should have been re-worded to better clarify the meaning of this.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:46 pm
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690

by pkw209 » Mon Apr 26, 2010 4:18 pm
I'll go with C. Self-employment implies that workers will not need to look for jobs in the future. Along the same lines, future opportunities are unimportant. Therefore, D and E are irrelevant.

Official answer?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:42 am
Please post the OA with explanation. I pick [spoiler]'D'.[/spoiler]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:46 pm
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690

by pkw209 » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:59 pm
Please post OA, source and explanation.

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:23 pm
one more for E

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:20 am
Thanked: 2 times

by ansh.kumar » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:24 am
hiiiii, my pick is ^e^ . if u negate the statement Most of those currently receiving unemployment insurance can not be adequately retrained for the jobs that will be available in near future that wud be directly weaken the argument and the author wud nt say that today an unemployed worker is out of work as his position has been eliminated.
in^D^ if u negate this statement As the economy changes, there will not be an increasing number of job opportunities available for skilled workers. i think it will impartially weaken the argument cuz skilled workers CAN still become a SELF EMPLOYEE. thnks