BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Two part analysis - Sample question

Data Sufficiency, Multi-Source Reasoning, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, Two-Part Analysis
Expert replies
by bubbliiiiiiii » Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:30 am
Hi, Can anyone explain the answer to second column for the question posted at the following URL:

https://www.mba.com/the-gmat/nex-gen/sam ... 6?next=yes
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Insights |

by internetstanley » Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:24 am
The answer is D.

You need to solve for the ratio of Students in 2004 to Faculty in 2004 (# students in 2004 (or #_s henceforth) / # faculty in 2004 (or #_f henceforth)). #_s is the original 5500 * (100% - S%) (because the number of students is decreasing). #_f is the # of faculty in '99 * (100% + F%) (because the number of faculty is increasing). Next you would solve for the # of faculty in '99, which is 5500 students / R (R = # students/#faculty so 1/R = #faculty/#students).

Overall this means that your equation is 5500 (100-S) / (5500 / R * (100+F). Do a small bit of factoring and you get ((100-S)/(100+F)) * R.

I don't have a lot of experience answering math questions on forum boards so my thinking may come across a bit scattered. I hope this makes sense.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:18 am
You are right.

but it is E at mba.com - (100+S)/(100+F)R !!!!!
Join the discussion

by eagleeye » Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:49 pm
The answer to the question at mba.com is correct. It should be R*(100+S)/(100+F).

Remember that S and F both are %age change. They also give the definition of F and S, for the same reason. S= 100*(S_new-S_old)/S_old. This means that S itself is negative as we are given that student enrollment decreases. Therefore we don't subtract S%, we just add it the usual way.

1999: Students = 5500;
1999: Faculty = 5500/R
2004: Students change by S% so S_new = 5500*(1+S%) = 5500*(100+S)/100;
2004: Faculty changes by F% so F_new = 5500/R * (1+F%) = 5500*(100+F)/(100R)

So Answer for second part is S_new/F_new = R*(100+S)/(100+F)

Let me know if this helps :)
Join the discussion