BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Triangle Rules vs Sines and Cosines

Share feedback about this free GMAT prep guide
Expert replies
by freiter1 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:34 pm
The 30-60-90 and isosceles triangle rules regarding side ratios are difficult for me to remember...

I did undergraduate and graduate school in engineering (7+years) thinking of triangles in terms of sines and cosines. Since the angles on the gmat are either 30, 45, 60, or 90, I can easily compute the sine or cosine of an angle in my head. It's 5x times faster for me to just take the sines and cosines of the angles in my head and work from there and I'm much more confident in my answer. As oppossed to when I use the triangle rule where I'm second guessing if I remembered the rule correctly or not and then I usually end up taking sines and cosines to check my answer anyways.

Are there any potential problems with me tossing out triangle side ratio rules from my memory? Or can I just stick with sines and cosines.

I know this must sound crazy to most people, but I've been doing it this way for so long and I also do it on a regular basis in my day-to-day job.

Any feedback is appreciated.
Join the discussion
Source: — The 60-Day GMAT Study Guide |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:17 pm
freiter1 wrote:The 30-60-90 and isosceles triangle rules regarding side ratios are difficult for me to remember...

I did undergraduate and graduate school in engineering (7+years) thinking of triangles in terms of sines and cosines. Since the angles on the gmat are either 30, 45, 60, or 90, I can easily compute the sine or cosine of an angle in my head. It's 5x times faster for me to just take the sines and cosines of the angles in my head and work from there and I'm much more confident in my answer. As oppossed to when I use the triangle rule where I'm second guessing if I remembered the rule correctly or not and then I usually end up taking sines and cosines to check my answer anyways.

Are there any potential problems with me tossing out triangle side ratio rules from my memory? Or can I just stick with sines and cosines.

I know this must sound crazy to most people, but I've been doing it this way for so long and I also do it on a regular basis in my day-to-day job.

Any feedback is appreciated.
Hi freiter1,

Can you give us a specific example of what you're talking about?
In general, it's important to know the various ratios of the special right triangles (30-60-90 and 45-45-90), because, in most cases, the answer choices are exact.

Here's a very basic example: let's say we have an isosceles right triangle (ie, a 45-45-90 triangle), and one of the legs has length 1. What's the hypotenuse?
Using the ratios of the special right triangles, we quickly know that the length of the hypotenuse = √2
You may know (from engineering) that sin45 ≈ 0.707, so, the length of the hypotenuse = 1/0.707
If you recognize that 1/0.707 ≈ √2, that's great. Otherwise, you'll be in trouble.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by freiter1 » Sat Apr 18, 2015 5:36 pm
Hi Brent thanks for the response.

I tend to work sines and cosines in terms of square roots. Fair point if I saw 1/0.707 I wouldn't recognize that as 1/sqrt(2) while under pressure.

I learned that Sines and cosines of an angle are as easy as 1-2-3,3-2-1 just make this chart

30 ; 45; 60
Sin 1 ; 2 ; 3
Cos 3 ; 2 ; 1

Next you take square root and divide by 2

30 ; 45 ; 60
Sin 1/2 ; sqrt(2)/2 ; sqrt(3)/2
Cos sqrt(3)/2 ; sqrt(2)/2 ; 1/2

As an example problem from the OG for GMAT PS #92. I found it easier to say sin 60 = sqrt(3)/2 =opp/hyp.

so opp= 70*sqrt(3)/2=35*sqrt(3). Then the problem saysthe base of the ladder is 7ft above groung so final answer. 35*sqrt(3)+7 or letter D.

In other words when I'm taking a sine or cosine of angle, I'm really just counting 1-2-3 or 3-2-1, depending if I want sine or cosine.

I know this unconventional but are there any pitfalls you see with this approach?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Apr 18, 2015 7:43 pm
I think test-takers need to work to their strengths.
If that approach quickly gets you to the correct answer, then that's the best approach (for you).

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion