BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tough one

Expert replies
by gmat620 » Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:20 am
I am confused between B and D
Plz explain both options...thanks
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.

[spoiler][/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by karmayogi » Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:14 pm
Had D true, the pollution level should have increased in 1989, opposite of the given premises in the argument. B shows that in 1988 a more accurate spectrometer was invented, facilitating better measurements. B could be a reason for reduction in the number of smog alerts. Hence, IMO D.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by ssilver0210 » Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:33 pm
In a question like this, it's best to explain all answer choices, and determine which is least likely to help explain the drop in air pollution levels in 1989.

A helps to explain why the drop wasn't until 1989, because the new measure were not put into effect until very late in 1988.

B helps to explain why the drop wasn't until 1989 because in late 1988, a new device was used to measure the amount of smog, and the device by measuring it more accurately might have measured a lesser amount of smog in the atmosphere, resulting in a lesser number of alerts.

C helps to explain why the drop wasn't until 1989, because the new revision in 1989 could have raised the amount of smog necessary for an alert, and therefore decreased the total number of alerts in 1989.

E helps to explain why the drop wasn't until 1989, because in the 2 years prior, the pollutants had not yet broken down naturally, and were still in the atmosphere, causing the increased number of alerts.

D, however, does not help to explain why the drop wasn't until 1989. According to D, the mayor accepting large donations from certain certain industries, and exempted those industries from air pollution control measures. That being the case, with less industries being measured, we would expect to see a decrease in 1988. So this does not at all help to explain why the decrease did not occur until 1989.
--Sean

I provide GMAT (verbal) tutoring in NYC, and over Skype/E-mail. Please contact [email protected] for further information, or if you have any questions at all.
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sat May 14, 2016 2:26 am
I also think D should be the answer
Join the discussion