tough CR! help me!

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:27 am

tough CR! help me!

by UrFellow » Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:14 am
Anole lizard species that occur together (sympatrically) on certain Caribbean islands occupy different habitats: some live only in the grass, some only on tree trunks, and some only on twigs. These species also differ morphologically: grass dwellers are slender with long tails, tree dwellers are stocky with long legs, twig dwellers are slender but stubby-legged. What is striking about these lizards is not that coexisting species differ in morphology and habitat use (such differences are common among closely related sympatric species), but that the same three types of habitat specialists occur on each of four islands: Puerto Rico, Cuba, Hispaniola, and Jamaica. Moreover, the Puerto Rican twig species closely resembles the twig species of Cuba, Hispaniola, and Jamaica in morphology, habitat use, and behavior. Likewise, the specialists for other habitats are similar across the islands. The presence of similar species on different islands could be variously explained. An ancestral species might have adapted to exploit a particular ecological niche on one island and then traveled over water to colonize other islands. Or this ancestral species might have evolved at a time when the islands were connected, which some of these islands may once have been. After the islands separated, the isolated lizard populations would have become distinct species while also retaining their ancestors' niche adaptations. Both of these scenarios imply that specialization to each niche occurred only once. Alternatively, each specialist could have arisen independently on each of the islands.
If each type of specialist evolved just once, then similar specialists on different islands would be closely related. Conversely, if the specialists evolved independently on each island, then a specialist on one island would be more closely related to other types of anoles on the same island-regardless of their ecological niches- than it would be to a similar specialist on a different island. Biologists can infer how species are related evolutionarily by comparing DNA sequences for the same genes in different species. Species with similar DNA sequences for these genes are generally more closely related to each other than to species with less-similar DNA sequences. DNA evidence concerning the anoles led researchers to conclude that habitat specialists on one island are not closely related to the same habitat specialists elsewhere, indicating that specialists evolved independently on each island.
36. The passage suggests that if a grass-dwelling anole lizard species evolved on one island and then traveled over water to colonize a second island, the grass-dwelling anoles on the two islands would eventually
A. develop very different DNA sequences
B. develop into different species that are more distantly related to each other than to tree- and twig-dwelling anoles on their own islands
C. come to differ significantly from one another in habitat use
D. develop into different, but closely related, species
E. evolve significant morphological differences
[spoiler]OA:D
IMO:C
why??[/spoiler]

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:38 am
Location: Lisbon
Thanked: 1 times

by oagostinho » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:51 am
Well, I think that this part of text:

"...An ancestral species might have adapted to exploit a particular ecological niche on one island and then traveled over water to colonize other islands. Or this ancestral species might have evolved at a time when the islands were connected, which some of these islands may once have been. After the islands separated, the isolated lizard populations would have become distinct species while also retaining their ancestors' niche adaptations..."


Will support why the choice (D) it's true! What do you think about it?

Cheers!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 12 times

by vijay_venky » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:21 pm
"If each type of specialist evolved just once, then similar specialists on different islands would be closely related."

I think the above sentence supports answer D.

About C while coexisting species have been cited while defining the difference in the habitat use, no mention has been made about the significance of difference in the same category across the islands.(the similarity has been cited though)

So no support for the option C could be gathered from this.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:14 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Spring2009 » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:49 pm
It can't be C because:
"Moreover, the Puerto Rican twig species closely resembles the twig species of Cuba, Hispaniola, and Jamaica in morphology, habitat use, and behavior"

This sentence states that the similar species in two ilands resemble in habitat use, while C says that they differ in hatitat use.

It's D because:
"After the islands separated, the isolated lizard populations would have become distinct species while also retaining their ancestors niche adaptations"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:45 am
Thanked: 2 times

d

by sumank8216 » Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:25 am
If each type of specialist evolved just once, then similar specialists on different islands would be closely related."

The question mentions only one evolution on the first island, thsi clrearly supports D.