To support the academic efforts of its former students, the

OPTION A:- CORRECT
The major point can be gotten from the former reading material being used is that , it is of a better quality than the paper published by the former students.
The quality of the additional reading material is said to have declined and hamper the professors' effort to teach effectively, which shows that the former paper is of better quality than the new ones.

OPTION B:- INCORRECT
If the papers were written by the professors themselves, there won't be need for additional reading materials and it won't be of low quality.

OPTION C:- INCORRECT
This is a known fact in the argument. and doesn't need to be a new fact that has just been deduced about the formal reading materials.

OPTION D:- INCORRECT
There is no significant argument to back this claim up, so we can't infer that the former papers were of increasingly high qualities nor can we conclude that prior to its change. there was a major educational crisis.

OPTION E:- INCORRECT
This is a known fact because the argument is more concerned about the quality of the reading materials and how the professor can use it to teach effectively which shows that it is necessary for the proper education of the university students.