BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tiger beetles

Expert replies
by dustystormy » Mon Sep 05, 2016 2:25 am
Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect. However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack. Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest; but an alternative hypothesis is that while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop. Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?

A. When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.

B. In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.

C. The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.

D. If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.

E. When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by dustystormy » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:27 pm
I am sorry that I forgot the add the specific thing I want to everyone to discuss. Can experts please discuss the each convoluted options.
OA C
Join the discussion

by prabsahi » Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:03 am
The hypetheses as stated are:
1.There is an equal interval of pauses --for rest
2.To catch the quickly changing visual images

Now the question says that one of the option undermines one hypothesis and supports the other.Lets evaluate the options.In short the correct option should strengthen one hypothesis and weaken the other.

A.Beetle doesn't stop--No efefct. Beetle stops according to both the hypothesis

B.Beatles respond to changes in insect direction--Now this doesn't support the hypotheses because one of them is for rest and the other is for usual.This clearly pertains to insect movement ans so is not relevant.

C.Beetles maintain fixed intervals between pauses --and the beetle increases its speed based on insects fleeing-- so this mean that it probably facilitates better visualization thats why they stop..

D.Out of scope.We are concerned with the hypotheses and stops

E.Nothing in this option is relevant to the strengthening or weakening of the hypothesis.It discusses sudden stop while the argument is concerned about pauses and its relevance to stated hypothesis.
If you want to fly,you have to give up the things that weighs you down!

PS
Join the discussion

by Cthulu » Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:17 pm
I was leaning slightly towards B actually. If the beetle is responding immediately to the insects change of direction means it is certainly not going blind during pursuit as it can visually follow the insect's movements. This debunks the "going blind" theory. Whereas they pause frequently during the chase irrespective of the inclination because they cannot maintain their pace.....

I don't see how C debunks the going blind theory though it partially supports the "cannot maintain pace theory".
Join the discussion

by prabsahi » Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:59 pm
Cthulu wrote:I was leaning slightly towards B actually. If the beetle is responding immediately to the insects change of direction means it is certainly not going blind during pursuit as it can visually follow the insect's movements. This debunks the "going blind" theory. Whereas they pause frequently during the chase irrespective of the inclination because they cannot maintain their pace.....

I don't see how C debunks the going blind theory though it partially supports the "cannot maintain pace theory".
See option B
B. In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline


The second hypothesis is about the the rests or equal pauses that beetles take because they loose the visuals of the fast moving target.Now what is implied by your statement is that it is not going blind..we have to prove that these rests are not for chasing the beetle and that 'not being blind' or beetle having No sight will have no impact on the conclusion.We need to weaken hypothesis.

Now Pausing frequently with fixed interval also doesnt helps debunk the first hypothesis.Its stated whether its an uphill or downhill they maintain same equal intervals of pauses.Now During uphill they definitely should have paused for larger interval of time.Please notice the words in statement to--Up or down incline

Hope it helps!!
:)
If you want to fly,you have to give up the things that weighs you down!

PS
Join the discussion

by Cthulu » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:23 pm
Actually yes, B debunks both theories, : If the beetle were blind it would not change direction when the insect is moving around.Also, since the frequency of rest is the same whether going uphill or downhill means the reason for not stopping is not "tiredness"...since it is not supporting (however mildly) either of the options B cannot be correct. I still feel C is not a strong option but is the best of what is available.

Thanks.
Join the discussion