BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

This Week's Manhattan challenge problem

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: India
by enjoylife1788 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:34 pm
Dear members,

I came across this week's manhattan question and have no clue how to go about solving it. So can someone make me understand please?

Line m and line n intersect, forming 4 angles. Does any of these angles measure greater than 120°?

(1) The product of the measures, in degrees, of the four angles is less than 2^10 3^4 5^4.
(2) The product of the measures, in degrees, of the four angles is greater than 2^14 5^4.

I dont know what OA is.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 amFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 230 times

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:21 am
For 2 intersecting lines we know opposite sides are equal.

Let the 2 angles be x & y.
We know x + y = 180.

From (1) we know;

x^2 * y^2 = 2^10 * 3^4 * 5^4
Taking root, we have
xy = 2^5 * 3^2 * 5^2 = 7200.
We know, x+y = 180.
y = 180 -x

x(180-x) < 7200.

Angles can take values from (0-60). If x < 60, then Y will be greater than 120 (or) vice-versa. Sufficient.
Sufficient.

From (2);

xy= 2^7 * 5^2 = 3200.
And, similarly, x(180-x) > 3200.

The angles can take values from 20-160. We can't say if it will be less than 120 or greater. Insufficient.

A IMO.
Last edited by shankar.ashwin on Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: India

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:51 am
I guess you got the inequalities wrong.

Statement 1 says its less than 7200 and Statement 2 says its greater. :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: India

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:08 am
Also, I got a bit confused there. So did it my way. A bit length at first. So please correct me if m wrong :)

Statement 1 says,

x(180-x)<7200
180x-x^2<7200
-x^2+180x-7200<0

x^2-180x+7200>0 (Multiplying both sides by -1)
(x-120) (x-60) > 0

x> 120 and x>60

so when x is greater than 120, y is less than 60 and when x is greater than 60, y is less than 120.

so one of them is greater, hence sufficient

Statement 2 says,

xy>3200
x(180-x)>3200
similarly as 1, x^2 - 180x + 3200 < 0

(x-160) (x-20) < 0

x< 160 and x< 20.

Here, I don't understand, is it sufficient. It says its less than 160, so when x is less than 160, y is greater than 20. Accordingly, when x is less than 20, y is greater than 160.


First of all, is this explanation correct. And even if it is, m sure there is a better explanation than i have given. Please GMAT gurus, explain this problem. :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 amFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 230 times

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:10 am
Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: India

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:19 am
shankar.ashwin wrote:Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Your Welcome :)

But i need your help to understand how you reached to those range of values. I know its too stupid. But I am just not getting it right now. ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 amFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 230 times

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:29 am
enjoylife1788 wrote:
shankar.ashwin wrote:Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Your solution is correct. Solving the quadratic equation gives you limits for the equation. You know roots of the equation are 20,160.

Roots are when the equations change sign usually. So test the inequality for 3 segments.

(0-20) (20-160) and (160-180)

You can see the condition x(180-x)>3200 holds true only for the range (20-160).

From this we cannot say if one angle would be greater than 120.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: India

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:49 am
shankar.ashwin wrote:
enjoylife1788 wrote:
shankar.ashwin wrote:Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Your solution is correct. Solving the quadratic equation gives you limits for the equation. You know roots of the equation are 20,160.

Roots are when the equations change sign usually. So test the inequality for 3 segments.

(0-20) (20-160) and (160-180)

You can see the condition x(180-x)>3200 holds true only for the range (20-160).

From this we cannot say if one angle would be greater than 120.
Ok I get it now. Thank You :)

So, The answer should be A.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: India

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 am
Confirmed. OA answer is also A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:04 amFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 5 times

by thestartupguy » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:51 am
Good question :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1