Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

This Week's Manhattan challenge problem

Expert replies
by enjoylife1788 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:34 pm
Dear members,

I came across this week's manhattan question and have no clue how to go about solving it. So can someone make me understand please?

Line m and line n intersect, forming 4 angles. Does any of these angles measure greater than 120°?

(1) The product of the measures, in degrees, of the four angles is less than 2^10 3^4 5^4.
(2) The product of the measures, in degrees, of the four angles is greater than 2^14 5^4.

I dont know what OA is.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:21 am
For 2 intersecting lines we know opposite sides are equal.

Let the 2 angles be x & y.
We know x + y = 180.

From (1) we know;

x^2 * y^2 = 2^10 * 3^4 * 5^4
Taking root, we have
xy = 2^5 * 3^2 * 5^2 = 7200.
We know, x+y = 180.
y = 180 -x

x(180-x) < 7200.

Angles can take values from (0-60). If x < 60, then Y will be greater than 120 (or) vice-versa. Sufficient.
Sufficient.

From (2);

xy= 2^7 * 5^2 = 3200.
And, similarly, x(180-x) > 3200.

The angles can take values from 20-160. We can't say if it will be less than 120 or greater. Insufficient.

A IMO.
Last edited by shankar.ashwin on Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:51 am
I guess you got the inequalities wrong.

Statement 1 says its less than 7200 and Statement 2 says its greater. :)
Join the discussion

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:08 am
Also, I got a bit confused there. So did it my way. A bit length at first. So please correct me if m wrong :)

Statement 1 says,

x(180-x)<7200
180x-x^2<7200
-x^2+180x-7200<0

x^2-180x+7200>0 (Multiplying both sides by -1)
(x-120) (x-60) > 0

x> 120 and x>60

so when x is greater than 120, y is less than 60 and when x is greater than 60, y is less than 120.

so one of them is greater, hence sufficient

Statement 2 says,

xy>3200
x(180-x)>3200
similarly as 1, x^2 - 180x + 3200 < 0

(x-160) (x-20) < 0

x< 160 and x< 20.

Here, I don't understand, is it sufficient. It says its less than 160, so when x is less than 160, y is greater than 20. Accordingly, when x is less than 20, y is greater than 160.


First of all, is this explanation correct. And even if it is, m sure there is a better explanation than i have given. Please GMAT gurus, explain this problem. :)
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:10 am
Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Join the discussion

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:19 am
shankar.ashwin wrote:Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Your Welcome :)

But i need your help to understand how you reached to those range of values. I know its too stupid. But I am just not getting it right now. ;)
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:29 am
enjoylife1788 wrote:
shankar.ashwin wrote:Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Your solution is correct. Solving the quadratic equation gives you limits for the equation. You know roots of the equation are 20,160.

Roots are when the equations change sign usually. So test the inequality for 3 segments.

(0-20) (20-160) and (160-180)

You can see the condition x(180-x)>3200 holds true only for the range (20-160).

From this we cannot say if one angle would be greater than 120.
Join the discussion

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:49 am
shankar.ashwin wrote:
enjoylife1788 wrote:
shankar.ashwin wrote:Thanks for pointing out the mistake enjoylife1788 :) Edited the post. I was wondering where I went wrong :)
Your solution is correct. Solving the quadratic equation gives you limits for the equation. You know roots of the equation are 20,160.

Roots are when the equations change sign usually. So test the inequality for 3 segments.

(0-20) (20-160) and (160-180)

You can see the condition x(180-x)>3200 holds true only for the range (20-160).

From this we cannot say if one angle would be greater than 120.
Ok I get it now. Thank You :)

So, The answer should be A.
Join the discussion

by enjoylife1788 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 am
Confirmed. OA answer is also A
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:51 am
Good question :)
Join the discussion